- From: Alan Painter <alan.painter@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 22:06:48 +0200
- To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Cc: public-xslt-40@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAN+GtW3YnowKJB9wvsme_zcDyiO8qHersEcvfwZxQFeuLnOeoA@mail.gmail.com>
Also, I notice that both you and Leo XIV have published on the subject today. http://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html On Mon, May 25, 2026, 16:38 Alan Painter <alan.painter@gmail.com> wrote: > You've convinced me. > > On Mon, May 25, 2026, 13:51 Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com> wrote: > >> Per my action, QT4CG-0165-01, here’s an attempt at an AI policy: >> >> Contributions must not include content generated by large language models >> (LLMs) or other probabilistic tools (including tools which are often >> colloquially categorized as "AI"). >> >> This policy applies to the specifications, tests, issues, comments, pull >> requests, and any other contributions to QT4CG. >> >> Although we acknowledge the many widely discussed ethical issues with >> LLMs, we will not refer to those issues as a primary justification for this >> policy. Instead, the specific justifications for the policy are practical. >> >> For most members of the community group, our efforts are focused on >> document review. Reviewing technical specifications requires comparing what >> the specification says with an understanding of what was proposed by the >> group and determining if they are aligned. This is a time-consuming process. >> >> LLMs are exceptionally good at producing large volumes of very >> /plausible/ text, but that plausibility is a statistical parlour trick: the >> LLM does not understand and cannot evaluate the output against any >> objective criteria. >> >> Any process that increases the volume of material that has to be reviewed >> must be held to the highest standard of intellectual contribution. >> >> A secondary practical concern is that LLMs have been trained on an >> enormous corpus of material, sometimes obtained in violation of copyright >> and other laws. Their output often includes verbatim samples of the >> training data. Incorporating such prose into the specifications may >> unknowingly violate licenses of copyrighted works. >> >> For these practical reasons, QT4CG does not accept content that has been >> generated or substantially constructed using LLMs, "AI", or any similar >> probabilistic tools. >> >> If you are uncertain whether the tool you wish to use, or the way in >> which you wish to use it, is covered by this policy, you are very welcome >> to discuss it with the CG's Chair. >> >> Be seeing you, >> norm >> >> -- >> Norm Tovey-Walsh >> CEO, Saxonica >> >>
Received on Monday, 25 May 2026 20:50:06 UTC