See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 13 November 2012
<scribe> ScribeNick: fjh
RIM/Certicom official response to PAG report: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Nov/0005.html
Reminder, no call next week. Next call is scheduled for 27 November 2012.
Approve minutes from 23 October 2012
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Oct/att-0015/minutes-2012-10-23.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 23 October 2012 are approved.
fjh: Last Call ended 8 November
... two comments, one on here() and one on separation of keys for signing and encryption (off-list)
Comment on XML Signature 1.1 and here() function, added this as Last Call comment LC-2721, see https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmldsig-core1-20121018/2721 in tracker
fjh: proposed resolution - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Nov/0009.html
... proposed resolution is to clarify bullet as noted in link to make clear that not namespaced, and to be treated as if part of the library
scantor: may not be an issue since now XPath filter is used anyway
... ok with the proposed resolution
Proposed RESOLUTION: change bullet referring to here() or clarity, as noted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Nov/0009.html, closing LC-2721
fjh: Ken noted acceptance of this resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Nov/0010.html
RESOLUTION: change bullet referring to here() or clarity, as noted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Nov/0009.html, closing LC-2721
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to update XML Signature 1.1 to address LC-2721 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/13-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-921 - Update XML Signature 1.1 to address LC-2721 [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2012-11-20].
fjh: this should not require another Last Call, just an editorial clarification
... key separation should be noted in XML Encryption 1.1, a security consideration, again should not require another Last Call
scantor: agree
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to propose additional security consideration for XML Encryption 1.1 key separation and update draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/13-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-922 - Propose additional security consideration for XML Encryption 1.1 key separation and update draft [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2012-11-20].
fjh: Last call completed, will make corresponding editorial changes, need to wait for exclusion period before going to PR in mid-December
fjh: No objection to Call for Consensus on list to publish "XML Encryption 1.1 Interop Test Report" and "XML Signature 1.1 Interop Test Report" as W3C Notes.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Oct/0016.html
fjh: I have prepared the documents for publication and submitted transition request (approved) and publication request. They should be published today.
fjh: we need to determine our plans with XML Security 2.0
pdatta: we had one person express interest in implementing 2.0
fjh: can you please contact them again?
pdatta: yes
fjh: this could help, also need to see about progressing XPath work independently
... will need to decide in January whether to go to Note or not
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to update Roadmap page to reflect current status [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/13-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-923 - Update Roadmap page to reflect current status [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2012-11-20].
fjh: next steps for 1.1 - editorial updates to reflect the two comments received during Last Call period, PR transition request 17 December
ISSUE-236?
<trackbot> ISSUE-236 -- Update all references in all Notes and Recs when publishing final REC? -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/236
fjh: checked with thomas, we can update references at the end of the process
close ACTION-920
<trackbot> ACTION-920 Check with W3C team on ISSUE-236 closed
ACTION-883?
<trackbot> ACTION-883 -- Frederick Hirsch to review C14N 20 test cases document -- due 2012-04-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/883
ISSUE-122?
<trackbot> ISSUE-122 -- Explain peformance improvements and rationale, relationship to earlier work, document, benchmarks -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/122
fjh: do not expect work on ISSUE-122 unless we have additional interest in 2.0 implementation
pdatta: correct, do not plan on working on this now unless there is a change
ISSUE-234?
<trackbot> ISSUE-234 -- Reference SP800-56A later in publication process if the latest version is no longer a draft -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/234
ISSUE-236?
<trackbot> ISSUE-236 -- Update all references in all Notes and Recs when publishing final REC? -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/236
fjh: both these issues are for reference updates upon final publication
fjh: any other business?
... none