See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 04 October 2011
<scribe> ScribeNick: fjh
PAG status, http://www.w3.org/2011/xmlsec-pag/questions.html
RESOLUTION: Cancel teleconference on 6 December and 27 December
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to update explanation of changes for XML Signature 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-838 - Update explanation of changes for XML Signature 1.1 [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-10-11].
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to update explanation of changes for XML Encryption 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-839 - Update explanation of changes for XML Encryption 1.1 [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-10-11].
Approve minutes, 27 September 2011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/att-0057/minutes-2011-09-27.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 27 September 2011 are approved
Updated XSD and RELAX NG schema files with updated copyright, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0065.html (Frederick)
Updated IETF RFC references, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0066.html (Frederick)
RetrievalMethod change reviewed, ACTION-834, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0064.html (Thomas)
LC-2488 updates
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0046.html (Pratik)
Additional editorial feedback on proposal - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0051.html (Paul Grosso)
fjh: change from Pratik looks good to me
<scribe> ACTION: pdatta to update XML Signature 1.1 and 2.0 with change in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Oct/0006.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-840 - Update XML Signature 1.1 and 2.0 with change in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Oct/0006.html [on Pratik Datta - due 2011-10-11].
<scribe> ACTION: pdatta to add link to canonical XML 2.0 samples into the spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-841 - Add link to canonical XML 2.0 samples into the spec [on Pratik Datta - due 2011-10-11].
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0049.html
magnus email -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Oct/0005.html
RESOLUTION: adopt XML Encryption 1.1 section 5.4.1 change proposed by Magnus
pdatta: question remains for ephemeral case
<pdatta> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0063.html
pdatta: note that I already made it clear that question is about ephemeral-static
fjh: suggest you resend that message to the NIST contact Hal provided as well as our public list
fjh: status summarized in my email - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Oct/0001.html
... I originally suggested we remove XML and use the OAEPParams only but Scott noted that won't be compatibible given existing implementations
... Magnus suggested we not add XML for MGF, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Oct/0004.html
... proposal is to rely on OAEPParams for MGF definition, but XML for hash value
... change is to update wording so that it is clear what MGF default is, but not to only require that value , allowing update in OAEPParams
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to propose updated spec language to address OAEP and SHA-1 issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-xmlsec-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-842 - Propose updated spec language to address OAEP and SHA-1 issue [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-10-11].
W3C Testing FAQ, http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq
Test Cases for C14N 1.1 and XMLDSig Interoperability, http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-xmldsig2ed-tests-20080610/
1.0 interop http://www.w3.org/Signature/2001/04/05-xmldsig-interop.html
ACTION-779, ACTION-793
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0056.html (Gerald)
pdatta: making table for key agreement choices, table for keywrap choices, symmetric key choices
fjh: latest from Gerald separates out 1.0 from 1.1 and 2.0 which should be helpful, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Sep/0056.htm
pdatta: will share the table I am creating and then we can consider how to merge with what Gerald has produced
fjh: that sounds good
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to follow up on possible additional interop participants [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-843 - Follow up on possible additional interop participants [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-10-11].