See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 14 June 2011
<fjh> ScribeNick: Hal
Next meeting June 28
<fjh> Approve minutes, 7 June 2011
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/att-0010/minutes-2011-06-07.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 7 June are approved.
<fjh> New Draft, see http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-transforms20/Overview.html
<fjh> should be REC track
<fjh> ISSUE-132?
<trackbot> ISSUE-132 -- Keep 2.0 xenc transform feature in sync with signature 2.0 -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/132
<fjh> My concern is that a 2.0 encryption document would be confusing since the only change would be the 2.0 transform use
<fjh> Hal noted that people might expect a 2.0 draft.
Scott: URI Attribute semantics are changing
fjh: need to review doc as it stands
<scantor> I think if I'd argue separate if it could be a new element, but if it's got to be Cipherreference, it should be redone within the base doc
fjh: agreement that it is rec track
question is whether to create a 2.0
Ed: agree with having a 2.0
<fjh> Magnus raises question of whether we open encryption for new features, for a more extensive 2.0 set of chagnes
Members should review the draft in preparation for publication, consider the 2.0 vs. 1.1 issue
<fjh> ACTION: fjh to send CfC for publication of encryption 2.0 transform draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-808 - Send CfC for publication of encryption 2.0 transform draft [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-06-21].
<fjh> ISSUE-132 closed
<trackbot> ISSUE-132 Keep 2.0 xenc transform feature in sync with signature 2.0 closed
RESOLUTION: Close Issue 132
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0027.html
<fjh> ACTION: pdatta to fix examples in signature 2.0 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-809 - Fix examples in signature 2.0 [on Pratik Datta - due 2011-06-21].
<fjh> XML Core WG Last Call comments
<fjh> response re XPath Profile, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0013.html
<fjh> Review and response to other comments needed, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html
<fjh> ACTION: pdatta to review and respond to additional XML Core WG comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-810 - Review and respond to additional XML Core WG comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html [on Pratik Datta - due 2011-06-21].
fjh: need to make changes to test results
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0025.html
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0026.html
Cynthia: changes are complete
<fjh> ACTION: cynthia to update wiki with suite b change [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/14-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-811 - Update wiki with suite b change [on Cynthia Martin - due 2011-06-21].
<fjh> issue: CR of XML Encryption 1.1 requires update to namespace refs, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0017.html
<trackbot> Created ISSUE-227 - CR of XML Encryption 1.1 requires update to namespace refs, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0017.html ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/227/edit .
fjh: sent off list message
... will discuss off list
... will not review issues