See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 09 August 2011
<fjh> ScribeNick: Hal
<fjh> Approve minutes, 2 August 2011
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Aug/att-0005/minutes-2011-08-02.html
<fjh> Proposed RESOLUTION: Minutes from 2 August are approved.
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 2 August are approved.
<fjh> please review editorial updates to resolve LC issues
<fjh> LC-2502 (substantive), ACTION-816
<fjh> change RetrievalMethod toKeyInfoReference for SHOULD
<fjh> Done, please review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Aug/0007.html
<fjh> LC2506 changes completed
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Aug/0008.html\
<fjh> RetrievalMethod in 2.0
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Aug/0010.html
<scantor> I don't think we have a good basis for barring Transforms *inside* RetrievalMethod itself as part of the general 2.0 changes
<fjh> proposed RESOLUTION: update 2.0 spec to treat RetrievalMethod same as in 1.1, specifically not disallow Transform within RetrievalMethod
<scantor> rather, we should make it a deprecated feature
<fjh> also should consider deprecating in 1.1 and disallowing in 2.0
RESOLUTION: update 2.0 spec to treat RetrievalMethod same as in 1.1, specifically not disallow Transform within RetrievalMethod
<fjh> ACTION: tlr to remind WG how to deprecate RetrievalMethod in 1.1 and disallow in 2.0 appropriately [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/08/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-820 - Remind WG how to deprecate RetrievalMethod in 1.1 and disallow in 2.0 appropriately [on Thomas Roessler - due 2011-08-16].
<fjh> ACTION: fjh to update 2.0 spec to treat RetrievalMethod same as in 1.1, specifically not disallow Transform within RetrievalMethod [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/08/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-823 - Update 2.0 spec to treat RetrievalMethod same as in 1.1, specifically not disallow Transform within RetrievalMethod [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-08-16].
<fjh> ACTION-814?
<trackbot> ACTION-814 -- Magnus Nystrom to make namespace ("&xenc;") related edits in XML Encryption 1.1 -- due 2011-07-05 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/814
<fjh> in progress
<fjh> LC-4288, detailed comments from Paul Grosso
<fjh> ACTION-802: Pratik Datta to Review comments from XML Core WG and formulate response, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html
<fjh> ACTION-810: Pratik Datta to Review and respond to additional XML Core WG comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html
<fjh> close ACTION-810 as duplicate of ACTION-802?
<trackbot> ACTION-810 Review and respond to additional XML Core WG comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html notes added
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jul/0018.html
<fjh> Need to send formal reply to XML Core/ Paul?
<fjh> LC-2487, change name of attribute from type to Attribute
<fjh> ACTION-809?
<trackbot> ACTION-809 -- Pratik Datta to fix examples in signature 2.0 -- due 2011-06-21 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/809
<fjh> ACTION-717?
<trackbot> ACTION-717 -- Pratik Datta to document the Performance improvements with 2.0 -- due 2010-11-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/717
<fjh> 1.0 (regression), http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/testing/test-coverage-10.html
<fjh> 1.1, http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/testing/test-coverage-11.html
<fjh> 2.0, http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/testing/test-coverage-20.html
<fjh> Writing testable conformance requirements, http://www.w3.org/TR/test-methodology/
<fjh> ACTION: fjh to post suite b interop material from Cynthia [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/08/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-821 - Post suite b interop material from Cynthia [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-08-16].
<fjh> do we need XML Encryption 1.1 and update to algorithms in 1.1 as well as other fixes.
<fjh> proposed change - disallow pkcs# 1.5 for generation (language analogous to sha-1)
<fjh> ACTION: fjh to propose XML Encryption 1.1 and associated changes [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/08/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-822 - Propose XML Encryption 1.1 and associated changes [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-08-16].