See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 05 April 2011
<scribe> ScribeNick: fjh
26 April 2011, 3 May, 10 May Teleconferences cancelled. Please make a note of these dates.
Approve minutes, 29 March 2011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Mar/att-0028/minutes-2011-03-29.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 29 March 2011 are approved.
no new status, PAG has not started yet
http://www.w3.org/2011/xmlsec-pag/Member/
PAG signups, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec/2011Mar/0003.html
Editorial updates
Updated Signature 2.0 with examples: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Mar/0032.html (Frederick)
Additional updates, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Apr/0007.html (Frederick)
added XML-PARSER-STAX reference, fix example in 2.5.3.2 id should be i2, various editorial cleanup
fjh: no concerns with publishing at this point expressed by those on call or list
2.0 Last Call
CfC, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Mar/0033.html
fjh: No comment, so planning to complete Last Call publication next week
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Interop
ACTION-779, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Mar/0030.html
gerald: should testing be separate for selection vs canonicalization etc
fjh: has benefits of modularity, but would like to hear from implementers
gerald: will expand into a table for the test cases
...: for verification and changes for 1.1
gerald: focus of my email was on 2.0
pdatta: also need to separate tests into mandatory vs non-mandatory
fjh: need to consider both dimensions
pdatta: concern about lack of implementation for non-mandatory features
fjh: will leave action open as Gerald works on table
ACTION-779: will update with table, mandatory/non-mandatory and separate functionality
<trackbot> ACTION-779 Review test cases for 1.1 and summarize which are missing notes added
ACTION-238 Update the proposal associated with ACTION-222 and send to list.Thomas Roessler2011-03-15XML Security Algorithm Cross-Reference
ACTION-411 Perform measurement related to transform octet conversionPratik Datta2010-06-30Performance
ACTION-426 Run performance tests on non-optimized Signature implementationPratik Datta
ACTION-699 Update interop wiki with suite B organizationCynthia Martin
ACTION-705 Confirm suitability of exclusiveJuan Carlos Cruellas
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Apr/0008.html
ACTION-716 Propose text for xpath and best practicesMeiko Jensen
ACTION-717 Document the Performance improvements with 2.0Pratik Datta
ACTION-778 Propose changes to the XPath profile related to using XPath 2.0Pratik Datta
propose to close due to lack of resources
ACTION-779 Review test cases for 1.1 and summarize which are missingGerald Edgar
ACTION-781 Check on commit message mechanism for xmlsecThomas Roessler
ACTION-778?
<trackbot> ACTION-778 -- Pratik Datta to propose changes to the XPath profile related to using XPath 2.0 -- due 2011-03-08 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/778
action-778: not making this change unless sufficient interest expressed during Last Call
<trackbot> ACTION-778 Propose changes to the XPath profile related to using XPath 2.0 notes added
close ACTION-778
<trackbot> ACTION-778 Propose changes to the XPath profile related to using XPath 2.0 closed
<gedgar> for action 779 I will create a table of test cases to use for interoperability, since some implementations will only address required functionality I will focus on that
ISSUE-86 Document performance criterial and benchmarks
ISSUE-91 ECC can't be REQUIRED2009-01-26XML Security
ISSUE-122 Explain why peformance improvements and rationale, relationship to earlier work
ISSUE-132 Keep 2.0 xenc transform feature in sync with signature 2.0
ISSUE-208 List 2.0 algorithms in algorithms cross-reference
ISSUE-217 XML Signature 2.0 needs 2.0 mode examples, e.g. , verification, selection etc.
close ISSUE-217
<trackbot> ISSUE-217 XML Signature 2.0 needs 2.0 mode examples, e.g. , verification, selection etc. closed
ISSUE-132?
<trackbot> ISSUE-132 -- Keep 2.0 xenc transform feature in sync with signature 2.0 -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/132
tlr comment on issue -> suggest to revisit when xml sig 2.0 comes out of last call
fjh: any action needed now?
ISSUE-208?
<trackbot> ISSUE-208 -- List 2.0 algorithms in algorithms cross-reference -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/208
<scribe> ACTION: fjh to review impact of 2.0 on algorithms cross-reference, ISSUE-208 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-787 - Review impact of 2.0 on algorithms cross-reference, ISSUE-208 [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2011-04-12].
Items of concern going forward: 1. publication of 2.0 last call, 2. PAG and ECC resolution, 3. Interop for 1.1 and 2.0, 4. Performance review and documentation
5. Evaluate and review comments on CR and Last Call (none to date)