See also: IRC log
<Ashok> scribenick: soeren
<Ashok> scribe Soeren Auer
No objections to approving minutes from Sept 12. Minutes approved.
Oct 30/31 will be f2f organized by Wolfgang
Wolfgang said he would send more information
No phone calls for next two weeks and no call 17th and 24th of Oct. Next call Oct 10.
Jenny Green provided interesting use case scenario
Orri updated RDB2RDF requirements
<juansequeda> This is the link from Orri's updated requirement document: http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/ReqForMappingByOErling
Orri gives an introduction
better definition of the scope of the requirements document
addition of usages scenarios
esp. with regard to mapping on demand
some kind of basic inferencing is required
e.g. when the same triples can be derived from different sources
properties of mapping functions (injective, bijective etc) must be known by the mapping layer
virtuoso provides some of the functionality already
question from Ashok about Simplicity
How can that be achieved?
Orri answers: maybe by two language layers.
often only few simple things are required
Soeren: why not use SQL as a mapping language?
<Ashok> Ashok: You can define a SQL query for each OWL class
Orri will collect some examples of thnigs which are not easily expressible in SQL.
<Ashok> Jenny: If you limit mapping to SQL you n only solve problems that SQL can solve
Limitation to SQL -- can only problems that SQL can solve.
Ashok: benefit of translating from RDB to RDF is integration of data, but the real value is when you can add extra semantic
Ivan: SPARQL is easier and simpler to write than large SQL queries
create a demonstrator that takes spatial operations into account in RDF
5 different data sources from different companies
questionnaires and knowledge elicitation techniques employed to create the data
creation of ontologies for the datasources
now merging of the ontologies and data sources
spatial attributes hae to be considered
SQUIRREL used for linking
starting point are SPARQL queries
one big table for polygons
seven different conditions define what is a field, many different constraints on the metadata
use of Oracle spatial operations
D2RQ used for mapping
no change of underlying data
sometimes preprocessing required
Orri: interesting use-case
Ashok: Excellent use case since it speaks about data from multiple DBs and allows addition of semantics
One more phone call till F2F
10th of October
continuing discussion of Orri's requirements and Jenny's use case
in the next conf. call
Orri promises additions till next call
Ashok, please continue discussion by emaily
<Ashok> Adjourn
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: soeren Inferring Scribes: soeren WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Andre1 Ashok AxelPolleres Ivan Jenny Orri Soeren iv_an_ru_ juansequeda scribenick You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Got date from IRC log name: 19 Sep 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-RDB2RDF-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]