I've removed 'B' because it makes no sense. We're down to three proposals.

- gp

Gilbert Pilz wrote:
Good idea. People should add their proposals as individual sub-sections inside this page: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/wiki/Proposals_for_6692.

I've gone ahead and created four proposal:

A. remove @Mode, leave wse:Delivery with attribute and element extension
B. remove @Mode, leave wse:Delivery w/out attribute extensibility
C. remove wse:Delivery element and all it's sub-elements
D. close with no action

I've also added some text on the pros and cons of each proposal. Feel free to add proposals and/or edit the proposals you feel strongly about.

- gp

Doug Davis wrote:

Actually, we really should spread the work around and people who have proposals that they actually want considered should upload them to that page.  With so many proposals out there I suspect most are probably old/dead and we should focus on just the ones that people are serious enough about to take the time to add to the page.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org

04/28/2009 05:48 PM

To
"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc

Subject
issue 6692: proposals for consideration wiki page







Geoff,

I figured you had a lot on your plate so I've started the Wiki page for this AI here:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/wiki/Proposals_for_6692.

I think it is a good idea to use the Wiki as that makes it easier to do group editing of the proposal text.

- gp