W3C WS Choreography WG conference call Agenda 10th May 2005, 3PM EST, 12AM PST, 19h UTC, 21h BST, 22h MET, 1. Role Call ------------ 2. Confirm scribe ----------------- 3. Agenda Changes ----------------- 4. Approve minutes ------------------ 3rd May http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005May/att-0004/MeetingMinutes20050503-2.txt 5. Action item review --------------------- 1. ACTION: Martin to do UML diagram from scratch for CDL IN PROGRESS 2. ACTION: SRT Check 1027 for issues pertaining to identity IN PROGRESS 3. ACTION: Add text in primer or spec to clarify participant relationship/role pertaining to issue 1027 IN PROGRESS 4. ACTION: Chairs to talk with the XPath 2.0 WG to determine the direction of three-valued logic and existential qualifiers IN PROGRESS 5. ACTION: SRT to create a new issue about accessory pertaining to issue 1128. SRT to investigate IN PROGRESS 6. ACTION: SRT to rewrite the exit criteria. IN PROGRESS 7. ACTION: chairs to respond to issue raiser for closed issues STANDING ITEM - Martin will start to close issues this week. 8. ACTION: Steve to learn about this issue from Nick for the Primer (issue 1079) IN PROGRESS 9. ACTION: Yves to define what is meant by correctness IN PROGRESS 10. ACTION: SRT to close issue 1002 and take action to add 1002-addressing IN PROGRESS Steve will try to move on some of his actions by next meeting. 11. ACTION: Charlton, Gary and Nick to discuss 1008 off line to resolve (leaving 1008 on the agenda) IN PROGRESS 12. ACTION: Close 971 as Resolved, won't fix IN PROGRESS. 13. ACTION: Record 996 as resolved fixed with text in minutes (12 apr) IN PROGRESS 14. ACTION: Record 998 as resolved won't fix IN PROGRESS 15. ACTION: Record 1018 as resolved fixed IN PROGRESS 16. ACTION: Record 1055 as RESOLVED LATER so is editorial IN PROGRESS 17. ACTION: Record 1079 as CLOSE WON'T FIX IN PROGRESS 18. ACTION: SRT - Put in text related to access and modify in the primer. IN PROGRESS 19. ACTION: SRT - Insert 1028 text provided by GBrown into Issue 1128. IN PROGRESS 20. ACTION: MC - Close 1110 with the proposed resolution. IN PROGRESS 21. ACTION: Martin to record issue 1102 as resolved/later. IN PROGRESS 22. ACTION: Tony to add rns: to the namespace prefix table in the WS-Choreography specification. IN PROGRESS 23. ACTION: Steve to close 1128 as resolved will not fix, but add text to the primer about the use of lists and arrays in CDL. IN PROGRESS 24. ACTION: Steve and/or Martin to generate a list of the issue numbers that the editing team should be working on as a spot check. IN PROGRESS 25. NEW ACTION: SRT virtual intro Tony to Jonathan Marsh 26. NEW ACTION: Tony to mull over and represent next week. 27. NEW ACTION: SRT to elicit clarification from invited experts 6. Proposals ------------ 1092 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1092 Summary: State relationship between WS-CDL and ebBP URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Jan/0034.html PROPOSAL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0006.html 15 minutes of discussion Consensus and/or vote 7. Issues requiring clarification --------------------------------- Summary of progress from last week: Issues still to resolve: 1008 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Summary: FAULT HANDLING URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0012.html GB: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Feb/0035.html REMAIN OPEN 1003 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1003 Summary: RELINGUISHING CONTROL OF PASSED OUTPUT CHANNELS URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0007.html ADDITIONAL URL: CLARIFICATION FROM INVITED EXPERTS 1128 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1128 Summary: Accessing and modifying members of lists and arrays URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-cdl-10-20041217/ GB: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Mar/0013.html REMAIN OPEN 1001 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 Summary: CORRELATION OF CHANNEL INSTANCES URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0006.html LATEST: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Apr/0036.html EXPECTING PROPOSAL FOR GB/SRT Other issues: Why do we have so many places in which we declare relationships and roles? e.g. "participate relationhip", "channel types" 9. AOB -------