W3C WS Choreography WG conference call Agenda 26th April 2005, 3PM EST, 12AM PST, 19h UTC, 21h BST, 22h MET, 1. Role Call ------------ 2. Confirm scribe ----------------- 3. Agenda Changes ----------------- 4. Approve minutes ------------------ 19th April http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Apr/att-0012/MeetingMinutes20050419-1.txt 5. Action item review --------------------- 1. ACTION: Martin to do UML diagram from scratch for CDL IN PROGRESS 2. ACTION: SRT Check 1027 for issues pertaining to identity IN PROGRESS 3. ACTION: Add text in primer or spec to clarify participant relationship/role pertaining to issue 1027 IN PROGRESS 4. ACTION: Chairs to talk with the XPath 2.0 WG to determine the direction of three-valued logic and existential qualifiers IN PROGRESS 5. ACTION: SRT to create a new issue about accessory pertaining to issue 1128. SRT to investigate IN PROGRESS 6. ACTION: SRT to rewrite the exit criteria. IN PROGRESS SRT: No change. Standing item. 7. ACTION: chairs to respond to issue raiser for closed issues STANDING ITEM 8. ACTION: Steve to ask Anders and Monica to address issue pertaining to 1092 Anders to take Charlton's text to meeting and to return with proposal IN PROGRESS SRT: Post next week per Barreto. 9. ACTION: Steve to learn about this issue from Nick for the Primer (issue 1079) IN PROGRESS 10. ACTION: Yves to define what is meant by correctness IN PROGRESS 11. ACTION: SRT to close issue 1002 and take action to add 1002-addressing IN PROGRESS 12. ACTION: Charlton, Gary and Nick to discuss 1008 off line to resolve (leaving 1008 on the agenda) IN PROGRESS 13. ACTION: Editors Role should be role type in this example. Tony believes this is done - but marked as in progress for now IN PROGRESS 14. NEW ACTION: Close 971 as Resolved, won't fix Chapman: Need to verify. IN PROGRESS. 15. NEW ACTION: Record 996 as resolved fixed with text in minutes (12 apr) Chapman: Need to verify. IN PROGRESS 16. NEW ACTION: Record 998 as resolved won't fix Chapman: Need to verify. IN PROGRESS 17. NEW ACTION: Record 1018 as resolved fixed IN PROGRESS 18. NEW ACTION: Tony to draft conformance section IN PROGRESS 19. NEW ACTION: Record 1055 as RESOLVED LATER so is editorial IN PROGRESS 20. NEW ACTION: Record 1079 as CLOSE WON'T FIX IN PROGRESS IN PROGRESS 21. [NEW] ACTION: Tony Fletcher - Verify actions are complete for specification. 22. [NEW] ACTION: SRT - Put in text related to access and modify in the primer. 23. [NEW] ACTION: SRT - Insert 1028 text provided by GBrown into Issue 1128. 24. [NEW] ACTION: MC - Close 1110 with the proposed resolution. 6. Proposals ------------ 1102 Summary: Combine Finalizer blocks etc. in their corresponding workunits URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Feb/att-0000/comment.txt PROPOSAL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Apr/0032.html Restriction can be lifted. 8. Issues requiring clarification --------------------------------- Summary of progress from last week: Issues still to resolve: 1008 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Summary: FAULT HANDLING URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0012.html GB: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Feb/0035.html REMAIN OPEN 1003 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1003 Summary: RELINGUISHING CONTROL OF PASSED OUTPUT CHANNELS URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0007.html ADDITIONAL URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Apr/0009.html REMAINS OPEN 1128 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1128 Summary: Accessing and modifying members of lists and arrays URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-cdl-10-20041217/ GB: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Mar/0013.html REMAIN OPEN 1001 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1001 Summary: CORRELATION OF CHANNEL INSTANCES URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0006.html LATEST: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Apr/0036.html Other issues: Why do we have so many places in which we declare relationships and roles? e.g. "participate relationhip", "channel types" 8. AOB -------