[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Expand definition of "administratively prohibited."
[webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Add example 1
[webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by pthatcher
Re: [webrtc-extensions] Encoding complexity (#252)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Encoding complexity (#252)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Encoding complexity (#252)
[webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by guidou
[webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Update SFrameTransformErrorEvent frame type from any to RTCEncodedVideoFrame or RTCEncodedAudioFrame
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
[webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Specify how negotiation modifies scalabilityMode
Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
Re: [webrtc-pc] webrtc/protocol/crypto-suite.https.html allows an invalid value in RTCTransportStats.srtpCipher (#3110)
Re: [webrtc-pc] track ietf bundlepolicy changes (#2684)
[webrtc-svc] Clarify getParameters() (#114)
[webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Don't reject scalabilityMode if UA can switch codec to satisfy it.
[webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Tighten up format of setParameters validation steps
[webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120)
[webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates contrary to the "supported by all but one" criterion (#3119)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates contrary to the "supported by all but one" criterion (#3119)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for half-implemented iceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates (#3119)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for half-implemented iceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates (#3119)
[webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate.getLocalCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118)
[webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not contain candidates that arrive via sRD instead of addIceCandidate (#3117)
Re: [mediacapture-transform] Is MediaStreamTrackProcessor for audio necessary? (#29)
Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add AudioTrackGenerator or equivalent (#124)
Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Header extension negotiation: Ignore stopped transceivers (#249)
[webrtc-extensions] new commits pushed by alvestrand
Re: [webrtc-extensions] Modify header extension init to ignore "stopping" transceivers (#250)
[webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by guidou
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Initialize maxMessageSize to Infinity
Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate.relatedAddress not hidden for remote prflx like RTCIceCandidate.address is (#3106)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Consider reverting nullable maxMessageSize (#3104)
Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Capturing audio-only (#12)
[webrtc-extensions] On the road to HDR (#253)
[webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: s/crypter/cryptor/
[webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate parse of IPv6 addresses could use some clarification regarding normalization (#3115)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Vague error for setting a description, inconsistent wpt (#3096)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by youennf
[webrtc-encoded-transform] Terminology: Encrypter or encryptor? (#311)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Terminology: Encrypter or encryptor? (#311)
- Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Terminology: Encrypter or encryptor? (#311)
Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Add a counter of dropped frames to MediaStreamTrackProcessor (#122)
[webrtc-pc] packetsSent/packetsReceived missing from MTI stats? (#3114)
Re: [webrtc-stats] What does a "transport" consider as "payload"? (#507)
[webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Obfuscation of RTCIceCandidate.address/candidate/relatedAddress is underspecified (#3107)
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify SDP parsing steps
[webrtc-rtptransport] No description of how peer reflexive candidates should be handled. (#120)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Finalize webrtc-pc WPT Interop 2026 (#3100)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Finalize webrtc-pc WPT Interop 2026 (#3100)
[webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection.sctp is updated in have-remote-offer, but nothing sets up an RTCDtlsTransport until later, and RTCSctpTransport.transport is not nullable (#3112)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection.sctp is updated in have-remote-offer, but nothing sets up an RTCDtlsTransport until later, and RTCSctpTransport.transport is not nullable (#3112)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection.sctp is updated in have-remote-offer, but nothing sets up an RTCDtlsTransport until later, and RTCSctpTransport.transport is not nullable (#3112)