Andreas Pehrson via GitHub
Andrew Verge via GitHub
Daniel Baker via GitHub
docfaraday via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] track ietf bundlepolicy changes (#2684) (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118) (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120) (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118) (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118) (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] What does a "transport" consider as "payload"? (#507) (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120) (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120) (Friday, 12 June)
- [webrtc-pc] We need to specify a comparison algorithm for RTCIceCandidate (#3120) (Friday, 12 June)
- [webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates contrary to the "supported by all but one" criterion (#3119) (Thursday, 11 June)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate.getLocalCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118) (Thursday, 11 June)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not contain candidates that arrive via sRD instead of addIceCandidate (#3117) (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate parse of IPv6 addresses could use some clarification regarding normalization (#3115) (Thursday, 4 June)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate parse of IPv6 addresses could use some clarification regarding normalization (#3115) (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Obfuscation of RTCIceCandidate.address/candidate/relatedAddress is underspecified (#3107) (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection.sctp is updated in have-remote-offer, but nothing sets up an RTCDtlsTransport until later, and RTCSctpTransport.transport is not nullable (#3112) (Tuesday, 2 June)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection.sctp is updated in have-remote-offer, but nothing sets up an RTCDtlsTransport until later, and RTCSctpTransport.transport is not nullable (#3112) (Tuesday, 2 June)
Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
Elad Alon via GitHub
Erik Språng via GitHub
fuzzy-coats via GitHub
guidou via GitHub
Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
Jakub T. Jankiewicz via GitHub
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by jan-ivar (Thursday, 18 June)
- [webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by jan-ivar (Thursday, 18 June)
- [webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Specify how negotiation modifies scalabilityMode (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates contrary to the "supported by all but one" criterion (#3119) (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates() does not contain candidates that arrive via sRD instead of addIceCandidate (#3117) (Monday, 15 June)
- [webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Don't reject scalabilityMode if UA can switch codec to satisfy it. (Friday, 12 June)
- [webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Tighten up format of setParameters validation steps (Friday, 12 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Initialize maxMessageSize to Infinity (#3116) (Thursday, 11 June)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Initialize maxMessageSize to Infinity (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidate.relatedAddress not hidden for remote prflx like RTCIceCandidate.address is (#3106) (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Obfuscation of RTCIceCandidate.address/candidate/relatedAddress is underspecified (#3107) (Thursday, 11 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Consider reverting nullable maxMessageSize (#3104) (Thursday, 11 June)
- [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: s/crypter/cryptor/ (Monday, 8 June)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Terminology: Encrypter or encryptor? (#311) (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310) (Thursday, 4 June)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify SDP parsing steps (Wednesday, 3 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Finalize webrtc-pc WPT Interop 2026 (#3100) (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Finalize webrtc-pc WPT Interop 2026 (#3100) (Tuesday, 2 June)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is "empty" value of RTCEncodedVideoFrameType useful? (#156) (Monday, 1 June)
- Closed: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Is "empty" value of RTCEncodedVideoFrameType useful? (#156) (Monday, 1 June)
John Wu via GitHub
Kacper Waśniowski via GitHub
NotASithLord via GitHub
Peter Thatcher via GitHub
Philipel-WebRTC via GitHub
Philipp Hancke via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-pc] packetsSent/packetsReceived missing from MTI "transport" & "candidate-pair" stats? (#3114) (Monday, 22 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230) (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230) (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] webrtc/protocol/crypto-suite.https.html allows an invalid value in RTCTransportStats.srtpCipher (#3110) (Wednesday, 17 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for half-implemented iceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates (#3119) (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] track ietf bundlepolicy changes (#2684) (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Interop 2026 contains idlharness tests for half-implemented iceTransport.getRemoteCandidates/getLocalCandidates (#3119) (Tuesday, 16 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.getRemoteCandidates is underspecified wrt timing (#3118) (Monday, 15 June)
- Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Spec does not define whether empty / no-data frames (e.g. padding) are delivered to a transform or dropped (#310) (Thursday, 4 June)
- [webrtc-pc] packetsSent/packetsReceived missing from MTI stats? (#3114) (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] What does a "transport" consider as "payload"? (#507) (Thursday, 4 June)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCPeerConnection.sctp is updated in have-remote-offer, but nothing sets up an RTCDtlsTransport until later, and RTCSctpTransport.transport is not nullable (#3112) (Wednesday, 3 June)
Tim Panton via GitHub
youennf via GitHub
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2026 17:30:54 UTC