- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:37:21 +0300
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 26 July 2026 10:37:24 UTC
On 2026-07-25 01:47, Garret Rieger wrote: > I ran the eligibility check across the open source collection, and not > a single case qualified for format 1. For that run, I disabled > optional features and used quality 1 which produces the simplest > possible segmentation plans, giving the best chance of qualifying for > format 1. OK so now I'm strongly in favor of dropping it. > Based on that result I didn't bother checking for size differences > between format 1 and 2. Naturally. -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus@mastodon.scot W3C Distinguished Expert, Color, Graphics & Fonts W3C Technical Programming Team, Core Web Design
Received on Sunday, 26 July 2026 10:37:24 UTC