Structure Review for Test Sample: content-structure-separation-programmatic_001.xml

Review Criteria

Review Result

Comment

Name and e-mail address of the submitter are available.

pass

no comment

Organization on whose behalf the test sample was submitted.

pass

no comment

Review Criteria

Review Result

Comment

All the submitted files follow the naming convention and directory structure.

not sure

CS to make changes in metadata document per teleconference of 06/23/08

All the files include correct links unless otherwise required by the test.

pass

no comment

All the files include correct spelling unless otherwise required by the test.

pass

no comment

Review Criteria

Review Result

Comment

All the files that are necessary to execute the test procedure have been submitted.

pass

no comment

All the files include valid markup unless otherwise required by the test.

pass?

used W3C validator?

Review Criteria

Review Result

Comment

The metadata files are valid TCDL 2.0.

not sure?

meaning of valid TCDL2.0? not sure - CS to check "expected results" attribute?

The metadata files use only elements and attributes specified in the Metadata Vocabulary.

pass

no comment

All the dates and other integer or literal values have the correct format.

pass?

need more clarity on definition of "correct format"?

All static values (especially copyright notices) are included and accurate.

pass?

need more specificity on definition and meaning of "accurate"?

All titles, descriptions, and other required fields are included and accurate.

pass?

need more specificity on meaning of "accurate"?

All identifiers (especially ID for techniques and rules) are used correctly.

pass?

need more specifics on what it means to be "used correctly"?

All structures such as rules, techniques, or pointers are used correctly.

pass?

ned more specifics on what it means to be "used correctly"?