- From: Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:52:05 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-vc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAOGO=oEEvw-HD5HrLjM660dJ5GDjOkcsdcZKBXrpYOvmO4Sc8A@mail.gmail.com>
As long as the recording and automatic transcription follow the Process, I don't have an opinion: https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#meeting-recording As mentioned in the meeting, if following the Process causes problems, those can be used as grounds for proposing changes to the Process. On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 8:16 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 6:47 PM <meetings@w3c-ccg.org> wrote: > > The audio recording is intended to be deleted after minutes are > published, to align with traditional meeting minute practices. > > I just remembered the reason why the audio/video recording probably > shouldn't be deleted. The transcription isn't always accurate, and > things can be transcribed incorrectly that might have negative legal > consequences for those speaking. In that event, we can always fall > back to the recording to see what the person actually said. I believe > this is the same policy that IETF uses for their auto-transcription > mechanism. > > Yes, in theory we circulate the minutes and ask people for > corrections, but let's be realistic -- hardly any of us have time to > read through the entire transcript and request fixes for every little > transcription mistake that exists with this new technology (or really, > even with human scribes). I think W3C Process should drop that charade > and admit that we are all very busy people and we don't have the time > to read every word of every transcript to make corrections. > > Therefore, archiving the audio/video is crucial to reduce workload on > everyone involved. > > > No way to say stuff off the record > > There is a way to say stuff off of the record, and that's to type it > into the chat window (which is not archived). > > > Manu Sporny: I think it should be an option for the working group to > continue and that party to not say anything or for the working group to say > that sorry this is the way we operate. my concern here is that you can have > one person throw off the entirety of the meeting,… > > Another option here is: If you are going to object, then you have to > scribe the meeting. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ > >
Received on Monday, 12 January 2026 18:52:45 UTC