Hi Sharon

Thankyou for having this discussion at today's meeting. I am sorry I could not attend, but it was at 4am New Zealand time and consequently I was fast asleep in bed.

I agree with the proposed workflow. The devil might be in the details e.g. will it be DIF PEv1, PEv2 or W3C Presentation Request that wallets should support? (FYI we have a solution for limited use cases of this); which status methods should be supported etc.\

I agree that this will need a longer timeline than either of the previous plugfests

Kind regards

David

Hello vc-edu,

 

Thank you for your helpful feedback on plugfest 2 and sharing your ideas for plugfest 3.  There are many important aspects of VC interop on which we could focus, but as we considered our primary objective – creating functional LERs, we think that the logical next step is to emphasize presentation exchange. 

 

We propose the following workflow:

• Verifier requests a set of credentials from holder
• Holder selects (3) relevant credentials from the wallet
• Holder presents to verifier in form of verifiable presentation
• Verifier verifies the authenticity of the VP (including DID auth on the VP) and individual VCs (including credential status check)

 

We have noted several other considerations in our slides deck: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SuyKPLmb1KqLPEsfDnzaBtd1GpGjuHH9e04RoWDojC4/edit?usp=sharing (proposed workflow is on slide 5).

 

Please let us know what you think about this approach – concerns, questions, etc.

 

Look forward to Plugfest 3, coming soon! 

 

Sharon