Hi Ninja,
It is a friendly amendment to Walter’s and also John’s detached append sentence from issue-170
Mike
From: Ninja Marnau [mailto:ninja@w3.org]
Sent: 25 June 2014 16:00
To: Mike O'Neill; 'Justin Brookman'; Walter van Holst; rob@blaeu.com; jeff@democraticmedia.org; Alan Chapell
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Subject: Re: issure-219
Mike, is this meant as a friendly amendment to Walter's proposal or a new one?
Am 25.06.14 16:29, schrieb Mike O'Neill:
Hi Justin,
So we are already OK, I missed that.
The proposal then becomes simply:
If a third party receives a DNT: 1 signal then:
1. the third party MUST NOT collect, retain, share, or use data related to the network interaction as part of which it received the DNT: 1 signal;
2. the third party MUST NOT use data about the user gathered in another context, including when it was a first party.
I would also add the new sentence about unique identifiers, along with the proposal for limiting their duration if for a permitted use, but maybe that will need its own CfO?
3. the third party MUST NOT store in the user-agent, or derive from data already stored, any unique identifiers.
Mike
Mike O'Neill
Technical Director
Baycloud Systems
Oxford Centre for Innovation
New Road
Oxford
OX1 1BY
Tel. 01865 735619
Fax: 01865 261401
--
Ninja Marnau
Technology & Society Domain
World Wide Web Consortium, W3C