4. Discussion of F2F meeting
5. Discussion of ISSUE-105: MAY a site send a response header
if there was no request header?
Language for review: "If a server has received a http request
that does not contain a DNT request header field, then the site
MAY include a response header field into the corresponding
response."
6. Review of new chapter "6. User-agent-managed site-specific
exceptions" in our working draft:
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html#exceptions
7. SHOULD or MUST for acknowledging a DNT;1?
Related to ISSUE-51 and ISSUE-81
Latest message in Archive:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Jan/0168.html
8. Discussion of ISSUE-106: Do we want/need response headers on
cache-able objects?
Opinions I've heard and remember were:
- Caches ignore headers, i.e., only URL not headers is
compared when
retrieving from cache
- Cacheable objects cannot be used for tracking
9. Announce next meeting & adjourn
================ Infrastructure =================
Zakim teleconference bridge:
VoIP:
sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
IRC Chat:
irc.w3.org, port
6665, #dnt