See also: IRC log
Vassilis, the logs and minutes will be at http://www.w3.org/2005/11/02-MMTF-irc
<Raphael> Jacco: ALL: read carefully the full document and the use cases
<Raphael> ACTION: ALL send feedback to the TF about the document, use cases, solutions ... [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/02-MMTF-minutes.html#action01]
<Raphael> Monday in Galway: TF have a dinner :-)
<Raphael> Second deliverable structure ...
giorgos: propose to split syntactic and semantic interoperability
Jacco and Raphael: how much will be in the syntax part?
is it useful to make this separation
giorgos, yes, conversion is one thing but alignment still needs to be done
syntax issues: from owl to non-owl, and vice versa
nikolaos: only images?
Jacco: yes, but we can discuss all more general standards to the extent they apply also to images
Raphael: borderline between feasability study and make conversion tools ourself ?
<vasilis> jacco it was vassilis talking about interoperability
<vasilis> no, nikos
Giorgos: jjc once stated he could help with conversion tools, we should ask him in Galway
vasilis, sorry for the mix up
vasilis: previous work and projects on semantic interoperability
Chris: hard to scope
vasilis: link on resource pages
giorgos: mention also in intro
jacco: do we need use cases for 2nd deliverable?
vasilis: yes, the issues are different for different domains
Giorgos: 2nd deliverable is more
abstract, we should not go into the individual tools
... we do not have time to do more, unless we have more
work
Raphael, ok, we can discuss this further in Galway. It is still not clear to me what is a good depth for the 2nd document
<vasilis> Jacco: prepare a 15 minuts talk about the deliverable and then focus on the reviews
<vasilis> Jacco: it is better to have one presentation
<vasilis> intro + deliverable
<Raphael> ACTION: Jacco prepares the slides for Galway [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/11/02-MMTF-minutes.html#action02]
RSSAgent, draft minutes
RSSAgent, format minutes