W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Qualified Cardinality Constraints

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:49:51 +0000
Message-ID: <4050363F.4080808@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
Cc: best-practice <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>

Christopher Welty wrote:

> I agree that we shouldn't be making or considering changes to OWL in 
> this WG, however it is important to point out representational 
> limitations of OWL and how (when possible) to work around them - agreed?

Yes agreed - however I would prioritise more basic problems in documenting 
how to make good use of RDF and OWL.

Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 04:50:21 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 11 March 2004 04:50:23 EST