- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:49:51 +0000
- To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: best-practice <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>
Christopher Welty wrote: > > I agree that we shouldn't be making or considering changes to OWL in > this WG, however it is important to point out representational > limitations of OWL and how (when possible) to work around them - agreed? > Yes agreed - however I would prioritise more basic problems in documenting how to make good use of RDF and OWL. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 04:50:21 UTC