Last Update: $Date: $
With the exception of one issue raised against the document, all have been resolved to the satisfaction of SOAP/JMS Working Group.
Almost all issues were raised by members of the working group, although sometimes as proxies for other people within the same organization as the person originating the comment/feedback.
Resolution summary below is one of the following:
Closed – issue accepted, addressed, and resolved to the satisfaction of the reporter
Agreed – issue accepted, addressed, and resolved, with no official word from the reporter
|
ID |
Raised by |
Details: Title/Comments |
|
Eric Johnson |
Title: Assertion Protocol-2013 is missing RFC 2119 language |
|
|
Commentary: Solution combined two side-by-side normative assertions into one |
||
|
Eric Johnson |
Title: Assertion Protocol-2020 missing RFC 2119 language |
|
|
Commentary: Solution combined two side-by-side normative assertions into one |
||
|
Eric Johnson |
Title: Assertion Protocol-2023 missing RFC 2119 language |
|
|
Commentary: Solution combined two side-by-side normative assertions into one |
||
|
Eric Johnson |
Title: Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table |
|
|
Commentary: TBD |
||
|
Eric Johnson |
Title: Protocol-2035 is redundant |
|
|
Commentary: TBD |