See also: IRC log
RESOLUTION: minutes approved
<MSM> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/02/xml-meetings-general.html
MSM: Who is expecting to be there?
Len: probably
Sandy: will try
Ginny: no
MSM: no
Kirk: maybe
<ginny_> one open action item 213 (Len)
<ginny_> Len: submitted EPR note html to CVS repository; passes most pub rules
<ginny_> ... one issue is link to patent policy
<MSM> Report: http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/sml/actions/213
Len: Conversion of xlink note is in progress
MSM: Action 210 no progress
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/sml/actions/210
... same for 211, 212
<ginny_> Kirk is expecting to have a draft ready next week
<ginny_> Len: does not yet pass pub rules; is expecting to have this ready next week
Should this document be stored in CVS?
RESOLUTION: Len will submit the 3 documents in zip in CVS
The version to be checked in is 'v4'. Location is as suggested by Len.
Len: formulas do need to be corrected as suggested by Ginny
<scribe> ACTION: Virginia to fix formulas after check in by Len [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-sml-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-214 - Fix formulas after check in by Len [on Virginia Smith - due 2009-01-15].
<scribe> ACTION: Len to update spreadsheet to reflect previous meeting minutes as proposed by John. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-sml-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-215 - Update spreadsheet to reflect previous meeting minutes as proposed by John. [on Len Charest - due 2009-01-15].
<scribe> ACTION: Len to check in documents to CVS [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-sml-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-216 - Check in documents to CVS [on Len Charest - due 2009-01-15].
<ginny_> MSM: leaving W3C at end of January; Henry Thompson will be taking his place
<ginny_> Jan 29 will be MSM's last SML call
RESOLUTION: approved as proposed; no needsReview
RESOLUTION: Fix as proposed; no needsReview
Group should review this prior to next week's meeting.
<MSM> do the rest of us agree with KW that it suffices to recommend that EPR not be used in SML-IF for non-embedded documents?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008May/0019.html
RESOLUTION: agree with Kirk's proposal as entered by MSM above
Kirk's proposal is already in the latest version of the EPR document
RESOLUTION: mark bug as FIXED
Everyone try to get feedback by next week's meeting (tomorrow is too soon).
Meeting adjourned.
Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending 2008-05-22 Lynn, James Until further notice 2008-10-29 Pandit, Kumar 1/8 2008-11-20 Gao, Sandy 2008-12-11 Wilson, Kirk 2008-12-18 Charest, Len 2009-01-08 Smith, Virginia Exempt Arwe, John Exempt MSM