See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Len Charest
<scribe> ScribeNick: lencharest
<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/att-0084/20090129-smil-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes approved unanimously
John: MSM did complete NS doc updates for CR, but not for older drafts
... Do we need to update older NS docs?
<johnarwe_> old http://www.w3.org/2008/03/sml.html
<johnarwe_> corr new: http://www.w3.org/2008/09/sml.html
HT: I will take on the action item and update the old NS docs
HT: We have been approved to go to PR
... I will handle interaction with the webmaster
... I'd like permission to make a change to status in the specs
<ht> "Note that substantive technical comments were expected during the Last Call review period that ended 3 October 2008."
<ht> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/02/PR-SML/sml.html#status
<ht> 3rd paragraph
John: Any objections to removing this sentence?
RESOLUTION: The sentence in question shall be removed.
<scribe> ACTION: HT to remove sentence from both specs: "Note that substantive technical comments were expected during the Last Call review period that ended 3 October 2008." [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/09-sml-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - HT
Len: I created the action item by hand. It is ACTION-218, due 2009-02-23.
<scribe> ACTION: Kumar to close bug 6260 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/09-sml-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-217 - Close bug 6260 [on Kumar Pandit - due 2009-02-16].
<johnarwe_> (from wg home page)
epr note draft http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2007/xml/sml/epr-note.html
xlink note draft http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2007/xml/sml/xlink-note.html
Len: In EPR note, consider 2nd para of introduction.
... I'm not sure what is meant by "a URI that may function as a URL".
... Suggest rewording: "a URI that may be dereferenced."
No objections to that suggestion at this time.
Len: Is there a W3 standard/best practice for mark-up of terms of art in docs? E.g., section 2.1, item 1: [local name]. Should it be hyperlinked? surrounded by square brackets?
<ht> XSD says "References to properties of information items as defined in [XML-Infoset] are notated as links to the relevant section thereof, set off with square brackets, for example [children]."
John: Should we make the mark-up consistent with the style in the SML spec?
No clear consensus.
John: If square-brackets-plus-hyperlink mark-up style is adopted, Notes should probably have an explanation of the notation.
Kirk: EPR note, section 2.1, item 2.c: Convert "SML reference target" to appropriate URI ref.
... Propose that footnotes be converted to inline notes (per practice in other W3 docs).
John: Any objections?
No objections.
John: Propose cancelling the meeting because it is Presidents' Day in the US.
No objections.
RESOLUTION: WG meeting on 2/16/2009 is cancelled.
Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending 2008-05-22 Lynn, James Until further notice 2008-10-29 Pandit, Kumar 2009-01-08 Smith, Virginia First half of Mondays (probably scribe-exempt) 2009-01-15 Gao, Sandy Second half of Mondays (probably scribe-exempt) 2009-01-29 Wilson, Kirk 2008-02-09 Charest, Len Exempt Arwe, John Exempt Henry Thompson[END]