from |
bug_id |
priority |
assigned_to |
target_milestone |
keywords |
short_short_desc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4617 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
SML Schema: The refer attribute in
sml:keyref should be optional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4628 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Relationship between SML and schema 1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4629 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Relationship between SML and XPath 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4630 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4632 |
P2 |
plh@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Use of IRIs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4633 |
P2 |
johnarwe@us.ibm.com |
CR |
|
Use of short namespace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4635 |
P2 |
plh@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
sml:uri element name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4636 |
P2 |
virginia.smith@hp.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment
identifiers? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4637 |
P2 |
kirk.wilson@ca.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
What should we do with EPR scheme? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4638 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
Conformance section needed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4639 |
P2 |
james.lynn@hp.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well
as document graphs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4644 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
|
Allow assertions on local elements and types |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4647 |
P2 |
virginia.smith@hp.com |
Second draft |
editorial |
smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including
text nodes, PIs, comments, ... ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4652 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
Should SML-IF be described at the octet level
or the infoset level? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4657 |
P1 |
kumarp@microsoft.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath
for SML implementation built on top of relational databases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4658 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
How should deref() treat multiple child
elements that use the same reference scheme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4665 |
P2 |
kumarp@microsoft.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC
3986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4673 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
why must SML references be derived from
sml:refType? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4675 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
add text in section 3.2 to require that
consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4676 |
P1 |
johnarwe@us.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
why we did not use sml:reftype in documentURI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4679 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Revise Section 6 in SML spec |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4682 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Attribute based reference schemes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4683 |
P2 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
What should deref() return when there are
multiple matches |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4684 |
P1 |
kirk.wilson@ca.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4686 |
P1 |
virginia.smith@hp.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml
schema valid" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4687 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4688 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Consider using xml:base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4692 |
P2 |
kumarp@microsoft.com |
Second draft |
editorial |
sml:keyref must specify either ref or refer
attribute (but not both) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4693 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
|
Clarify the purpose of applicationUri attribute
in Section 5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4739 |
P1 |
virginia.smith@hp.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
5.1.3 smlerr output element node serialization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4743 |
P1 |
johnarwe@us.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
clarify SMLIF section 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4746 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
|
clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4748 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
undefined term SMLIF section 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4755 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not
covered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4769 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
Mark model instance documents as root? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4770 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
Decide which schema elements should be changed
to global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4771 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
add name/id to rule bindings? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4772 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
add keyword substitution in smlerr localized
messages? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4774 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
definitional schema documents should be
preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4775 |
P1 |
kirk.wilson@ca.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
change process contents from skip to lax in
wildcards? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4776 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
conflicts between schema and text - declare
which wins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4777 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
Remove requirement that anyURI and its
derivations be treated as inter-document refs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4780 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
editorial (I think we decided on this) |
Correct section 3.4 targetRequired such that
targetRequired=true is not violated for empty or null references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4781 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
This is already marked editorial |
Make sml:uri tag have plain URI and do the same
in the EPR example in the address tag. removing EPR reference parameters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4788 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which
includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4793 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
Restructure section 3.4 to follow the
following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what
constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances. |
|
|
|
|
|
4795 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Update 3.4.2.2 so that its not enforce on empty
or null reference elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4801 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Think about making wording of bullet point 3
(if an SML identity constraint is specified for an element dec. E, then this
constraint is applicable...) to be more crisp about the scope |
|
|
|
|
4802 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression
must conform to...) we should remove the BNF and refer to the Schema spec
section instead and add that the xpath expression can also include the
deref() function |
|
4803 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated
for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the
schematron spec |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4807 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can
make them more clear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4811 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4819 |
P1 |
johnarwe@us.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT
interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other
than uri\" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4823 |
P1 |
virginia.smith@hp.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
In 3.3.6, Replace: If neither of these cases
applies, the inter-document reference is to a document not included in the
interchange set. Such a reference is called \"an unresolved
inter-document reference.\" |
|
4834 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
targetXXX attributes and sml:refType |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4865 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
clearly doc requirements for defining a
reference scheme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4872 |
P1 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
SML shouldn't reference xpointer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4884 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
update the definition of a null reference to
include the unimplemented-schemes case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4894 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
Clarify that acyclicity is determined
polymorphically |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4906 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
editorial |
In 3.4, don't write deref() function into the BNF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4941 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
LC |
needsAgreement |
support for references pointing to elements
other than root elements should be optional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4976 |
P1 |
sandygao@ca.ibm.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Is "multiple targets" a reference error? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4977 |
P1 |
virginia.smith@hp.com |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Schematron queryBinding attribute |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4978 |
P2 |
cmsmcq@w3.org |
Second draft |
needsAgreement |
Is smlerr:output necessary? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|