See also: IRC log
RESOLUTION: approve meeting minutes from 11/26 at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Nov/0301.html.
John: Jan. 08 local arrangement
page not available yet.
... SML needs to decide whether we want to attend Tue.
activity.
RESOLUTION: WG believes we have enough meeting time even if we finish early on Tue. and attend the activity.
139: reassigned to Kumar
153: reassigned to Ginny
5283 "interchange set" or "interchange model"
RESOLUTION: postpone. set target milestone to "CR".
RESOLUTION: WG approves changes suggested in comment #8 of bug 4656. Change 4656 to "resolved+fixed".
RESOLUTION: WONTFIX for 4657.
RESOLUTION: WONTFIX for 5133.
RESOLUTION: WG approves changes suggested in comment #5 of bug 5272. Change 5272 to "resolved+fixed".
MSM: suggest to change "may not be able" to "may be unable", because "may not" could be read as "must not".
RESOLUTION: WG approves changes suggested in comment #2 of bug 5178, with MSM's above amendment. Change 5178 to "resolved+fixed".
SG: About the question raised in comment #5 of bug 4770, suggest to add back the attribute wildcard to "dataType".
RESOLUTION: accept proposal in comment #4 and #5 of 4770, as well as the change suggested above to add back the attribute wildcard to "dataType".
Ginny: the proposal in comment #6 of bug 4774, why ignore schemaLocation on imports?
Sandy: schema allows different behaviors regarding <import> handling. here we try to prescribe a deterministic approach for assembling schemas.
MSM: why make <schemaBindings> optional?
Ginny: and what impact does it have to inter-op?
John: A compromise to help existing implementations.
Ginny: what problems did <schemaBindings> try to solve?
John: multiple versions,
chameleon includes, schema document exchange etc.
... for most cases, workaround is available.
MSM: a little uneasy about <schemaBindings> being optional.
RESOLUTION: accept proposal in comment #6 of bug 4774.
Zulah: question about the EPR proposal. don't understand why we need EPR in addition to URI scheme.
Kirk: Valentina sent out use cases earlier. linked from comment #1 in bug 4637.
Ginny: for guaranteed inter-op, SML URI scheme should be used.
We will defer this bug till the call next Monday. Zulah will study Kirk's proposal and Valentina's use cases and post her comments before then.
Pratul: do other people have comments on the EPR proposal?
Ginny: also wondering whether we need to include EPR in our spec. So only include URI schema.
Zulah: I share Ginny's concern.
Kirk: Certain EPR can provide inter-op.
Ginny: level 1 and level 2 in IF affects inter-op.
John: level 2 allows cross-vendor inter-op; level 1 allows intra-vendor interchange without having to always use the URI scheme.
Pratul: level 1 and 2 apply to documents, not producer/consumers.
Will put this on the agenda for next Monday.
RESOLUTION: WG approves changes suggested in comment #4 of bug 5024. Change 5024 to "resolved+fixed".
Ginny: about 4995, trying to see whether the "ref" attribute can be used to reduce the need to duplicate keys. if so, may be able to live with "scope".
Kumar: "scope" is a big
implementation burden. can be added in a later version, which
is not a breaking change.
... and it can be worked around in most cases by using existing
mechanisms.
Ginny: not completely satisfied, but can live with not having "scope".
RESOLUTION: won't fix for 4995.
RESOLUTION: accept proposal in comments #6, #7, and the amendment in #9, of 4687.
Editors should make sure the amendment in comment #9 is clearly specified in the wording.
RESOLUTION: accept proposal in comments #2 of 4772.
RESOLUTION: accept proposal in comments #15 of 4639.
John: suggest to make 5108
dependent on 4793.
... and mark 5108 as editorial.
RESOLUTION: make 5108 editorial and depend on 4793.
Kumar: when for bullet 3.d, when the primary alias is absolute, then the IF baseURI is ignored.
Sandy: would help to have a
conceptual alias, which is always absolute. if the syntax to
specify an alias is relative, then it is absolutized using the
IF-wide baseURI.
... then whenever we talk about "alias", it's always
absolute.
MSM: maybe we can specify that xml:base can only appear once in SML-IF document, then we don't need to invent our own baseURI element.
RESOLUTION: accept proposal in comment #4 of 5181, as clarified above.
Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending 2007-08-30 Lipton, Paul until mid-December 2007 2007-10-15 Waschke, Marvin 2007-10-17 Eckert, Zulah 2007-10-17 Kumar, Pandit 2007-11-08 Smith, Virginia 2007-11-12 Wilson, Kirk 2007-11-15 Lynn, James 2007-11-19 Valentina Popescu 2007-11-26 Boucher, Jordan 2007-11-29 Gao, Sandy Exempt Arwe, John Exempt Dublish, Pratul Exempt MSM Exempt PHMinutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.128 (CVS log)