SML F2F Day 1 of 3

scribe Marv

Bug 5098

Kirk: This is dependent on separation of normative and non-normative sections.

Kumar will update as dependent on 5091

Bug 5114

To editors

5117

Sandy: will look into use of unresolved

5117 marked editorial

5118

Discussion of whether or not producers should be required to use documentURI in the document/locator

Kumar- do we want to require support of non-embedded documents?

Sandy- What does 'not support mean'? Ignore? Raise error?

Sandy and Kumar: A reference may appear in a sml-if document, but the consumer does not have to do anything with it.

Kumar: Consumer must recognize that it is a reference.

Sandy: Consumer should inform the user that a reference was recognized, but not raise an error.

<Kumar> A conforming consumer :

<Kumar> MUST recognize that a document has been included in the SML-IF by reference by looking at document/locator element

<Kumar> MAY fetch a referred-to document for further processing

<Kumar> MAY report a message if it does not fetch a referred-to document

Current state: Text is to stand with may in the phrase "one way such references may be constructed" in caps and add sentence stating the fetching or dereferencing is not required.

Add sentence suggesting reporting on not locating document.

<johnarwe> bugs are being updated in real time with discussion results.

5119

Pratul: Open new bug on defining SML-IF inter doc references precisely and link this 5119 to it.

Link 5119 to 5120.

5121

<Jim> Rather than open a new bug, I updated bug 5120 to include this issue.

Pratul: Remove the 2nd sentence from 3.4.3

<pratul> Here's the new text

<pratul> SML [SML 1.1] defines two reference schemes, the sml:uri scheme and the EPR scheme. The definition of the sml:uri scheme specifies that it is an SML-IF inter-document, but the definition of EPR scheme specifies that it is not an SML-IF inter-document reference. SML also permits new schemes to be created without limit. The definition of each new scheme MUST be explicit about whether the scheme is an SML-IF inter-document reference.

<Marv> 5121: Remove 3.4.3 from SML-IF spec and move bullet point 3 to the SML spec ,

<Marv> The SML spec will then specify that new scheme authors must indicate whether or not the new scheme is an SML-IF inter doc ref.

<Marv> 5171

<Marv> Are multiple xml:base s needed?

<Marv> All to consider xml:base and 5171 overnight.

<Marv> How much latitude do we want to allow in interchange documents?

<Marv> generate minutes