<csma> agendum+ Action review

<csma> agendum+ Conflict resolution

<csma> agendum+ Bind action

<csma> agendum+ Publication planning

<csma> Scribe: Changhai

<csma> scribenick: cke

<csma> next item

review of the actions

Item 1: conflict resolution

Review and validate the CR proposal , as agreed in Orlando

<csma> PROPOSED: In RIF-PRD, the conflict resolution strategy that is intended for a set of rules will be indicated using keywords, at the group level. RIF-PRD 1.0 will specify one conflict resolution strategy (corresponding keyword to be determined) that can be summarize as follows: apply refraction to the conflict set, then order remaining instances by priority, the order top priority instances by recency (most recent first), then break remaing ties arbitrarily (precis

About csma's emmail, feedback from Changhai & Gary, but not others

<Gary> +1

The corner cases discussion

top level group vs. subgroups

CR strategy associated only to toplevel group?

Proposed: specify the CR only to the toplevel group. Any CR in subgroups can be rejected

<csma> PROPOSED: conflict resolution has to be associated with the top-level group, in PRD 1.0.

<csma> RESOLVED: conflict resolution has to be associated with the top-level group, in PRD 1.0.

What about one document without any CR strategy?

<csma> PROPOSED: rif:standardForward is the mandatory default conflict resolution strategy if none is associated with the top level group.

<csma> RESOLVED: rif:standardForward is the mandatory default conflict resolution strategy if none is associated with the top level group.

Now about priority...

<csma> priority can be any integer, positive or negative?

<Gary> how about xsd:int (or the closest we have in DTB)/

<csma> changhai: yes, and zero is the default

is a priority a signed integer? with positive or negative integer?

<csma> PROPOSED: priority is a signed integer, positive or negative and default is zero.

<csma> RESOLVED: priority is a signed integer, positive or negative and default is zero.

<Gary> [-1000..1000]

<csma> [-1000000..1000000]

I propose [-10000 ... 10000] to better suit coding convention

<csma> PROPOSED: range is [-100000..+10000]

<csma> PROPOSED: range is [-10000..+10000]

<csma> RESOLVED: range is [-10000..+10000]

<csma> rule R has priority 10

<csma> <Group>...<Priority>10</Priority> R </Group>

<Gary> PROPOSED: rule priority is given by the immediately containing Group. If that group has no explicit priority, then the priority is 0

<csma> <Group><Group><Group>R</Group></Group></Group>

<Gary> group p=1 (group p=2( rule1) rule2) => rule1 has pri=2, rule2 has pri=1

<csma> <Group><Group>R1<Group>(priority = 1)R2</Group></Group></Group>

or we can have: <Group><Group>R1<Group>(priority = default)R2</Group></Group></Group> in this case, you don't write the priority

<csma> Group

<csma> Group

<csma> priority=1

<csma> R1

<csma> Group

<csma> priority=2

<csma> R2

<csma> Group

<csma> Group

<csma> priority=1

<csma> R2

<csma> Group

<csma> priority=2

<csma> R1

<csma> RESOLVED: rule priority is given by the immediately containing Group. If that group has no explicit priority, then the priority is 0.

if "prority=2"is removed, then R2 will have the priority "default" (so zero)

<csma> next item

Bind action

We discussed whether one may assert membership and subclass relationships in PRD. The issue is that for PRD, these relationships are usually determined by a programming language such as Java, yet we do not want to write External(?o#eg:MyClass) or External(eg:MyClass##eg:MySuperClass) because these aren't in core. Also, membership isn't completely external in PRD because of the New(?o) construct, and we have a desire to represent schema-valid xml data as ground membership, subclass, and frame formulas. If we stick with the non-external (i.e. # and ##) syntax, then we need to support it somehow in rule conclusions, either by translating assertions about # and ## to "side relations" or errors.

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/with any/without any/
Succeeded: s/is none/if none/
Found Scribe: Changhai
Found ScribeNick: cke
Default Present: csma, Gary, [IPcaller]
Present: csma Gary [IPcaller]

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 04 Nov 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-rif-prd-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.