W3C - RIF Telecon 4 Jul 2006 Chair: csma Attendees on the phone: Sandro, Harold, Stan_Devitt (muted), DavidHirtle, PaulaP (muted), Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Axel_Polleres (muted), csma, Dave_Reynolds, JeffP, MarkusK (muted) Attendees on IRC: Donald_Chapin, johnhall, JeffP, DaveReynolds, AxelPolleres, MoZ, MarkusK, csma, PaulaP, StanDevitt, Harold, RRSAgent, DavidHirtle, Zakim, sandro, trackbot, Keep See also: IRC log Attendees Scribe JeffP Contents * Topics * Summary of Action Items csma: Next Meeting: 11 July 2006 PROPOSED: accept minutes of June 27 meeting http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jun/0182.html +1 ... to accept the minutes csma: minutes accepted RESOLVED: accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jun/0182.html as minutes of June 27 meeting csma: Agenda amendments? ... no Can't connect to phone - says 74394# is invalid very very strange, johnhall. :-( Action review [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/4] csma: any comments? 3. Liaison Action review [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/3] csma: Action about PRR draft still open becuase I haven't checked with Fair Isaac Is SPARQL connected with some action item? csma: nothing new on Liaison ACTION: csma and Chris Welty to solve the SPARQL liaison problem [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action01] Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel ack ??p13 4. Use Cases and Requirements Review actions [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/6] regrets on behalf of JosDeBruijn I substitute for DERI csma: Is the action on JosDB done? I think continued latest draft (I believe): http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/ucr/draft-20060628 csma: any comments on UC&R? ... DavidH sent an email on this +1 to remove the link to the CSF and keep the requirement Suggest leaving in the CSF, update the diagram to match, leave the other CSF's for future iterations csma: anyone support remove the requirement altogether? ... no reply ... two options, one from Paula the other from DaveR +1 for change diagram csma: we can ask Frank to change that ... anyone object? ... no reply ACTION: csma to ack Frank to do the modification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action02] Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel AxelP: shall we add a note in the XML requirement? +1 to Dave DaveR: we need some mechanism to track things we want to do after the release +1 to make open issues visible. sandro: it is more of a design issue DaveR: A wiki page can do the job ... three items on the todo list ... one on UC 2.5 ACTION: on DavidH to add the three items to the consider/document issue list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action03] Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel +1 the "to consider list" is small scale and leave in Wiki rather than confuse document +1 if we add a reference to the to be considered list I noticed that too, Paula PaulaP: the requirement is not clean ... under interoperability Yes, should be linked in I think csma: we agreed to remove it from the diagram ACTION: on Frank to remove the complain models, requirement from the interoperability diagram [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action04] Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel csma: other comments on the doc? AxelP: some minor issues that I can send to the mailing list ACTION: Axel to send a list with small edits by tomorrow night [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action05] Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel ACTION: AxelP to email the list per some small edit for the doc by July 5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action06] Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel ACTION: Axel to send another mail with issues "to be considered" and add it to the wiki within 2 weeks [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action07] Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel Can someone paste the URL of the issues list? new issues list: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Document_issues old issues list: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/WD-DC (section 2) I assume we're not talking about: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/open csma: it is not easily accessable ... other comments? ... I wll send an email to the list about the consider list ... for the details yes, it is clear csma: resolution: the WG will publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just discussed that is: csma: who is in favour of the resolution? PROPOSED: publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just agreed to Sandro/W3C YES Harold/NCR YES MoZ/Innovimax YES Paula/REWERSE - YES PFPS/Bolzano YES AxelP: is there a timeline for the next version? csma: between 3-6 months Axel/DERI_Innsbruck: YES MarkusK/FZI YES comment: we should not again postpone comments over more than one iteration Dave Reynolds/HP YES CSMA(with ILOG Hat)/ILOG: YES Jeff Pan / Aberdeen: YES Donald/OMG YES csma: resolution adapted DavidH/NCR YES (David Hirtle is the alternate for NRC.) RESOLVED: publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just agreed to no urgent issues csma: AOB? ... propose to adjourn +1 +1 adjourn +1 +1 bye Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Axel to send a list with small edits by tomorrow night [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action05] [NEW] ACTION: Axel to send another mail with issues "to be considered" and add it to the wiki within 2 weeks [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action07] [NEW] ACTION: AxelP to email the list per some small edit for the doc by July 5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action06] [NEW] ACTION: csma and Chris Welty to solve the SPARQL liaison problem [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: csma to ack Frank to do the modification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: on DavidH to add the three items to the consider/document issue list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: on Frank to remove the complain models, requirement from the interoperability diagram [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action04] [End of minutes] Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log) $Date: 2006/07/04 15:58:05 $ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]