Re: Request for extension of feedback period for RDF 1.2 Concepts and Semantics

Dear Michael,

thanks for your interest in providing feedback for those documents.

To reassure you, we are not currently in a position to publish those 
documents as REC, since we need at least one concrete syntax to reach 
that maturity level as well (we were expecting to publish N-Triples at 
the same times as Concepts and Semantics, but we still have to process 
some remarks from the TAG).

So, you still have some time to provide a review, which we are looking 
forward to.

   best

On 04/05/2026 22:44, Michael Schneider wrote:
> Dear RDF & SPARQL Working Group members,
>
> I respectfully request an extension of the feedback period for the 
> Call for Wide Review of the Candidate Recommendation Snapshots for:
>
> * RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Data Model
> * RDF 1.2 Semantics
>
> I would appreciate additional time to review these documents, with a 
> particular focus on the technical aspects of the changes compared to 
> the previous versions of RDF, and specifically on understanding their 
> potential relevance for a future version of the OWL ontology language. 
> I served as the editor of the OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics, which was 
> built on top of these two RDF specifications (then still in version 1.0).
>
> An extension of one week would allow me to dedicate the upcoming 
> weekend to a thorough review and to prepare my feedback.
>
> Best regards
> Michael Schneider
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2026 09:44:18 UTC