- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:18:19 +0200
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
the notion of surrogate pairs exists for utf-16 only. > On 30. Apr 2026, at 00:56, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't believe that this is at all what is being decided or even discussed. > > peter > > On 4/29/26 5:24 PM, James Anderson wrote: >> is the working group's intent to retain the restriction, that documents be encoded as utf-8 or to relax that restriction to permit utf-16? >> --- >> james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com > > --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2026 09:19:36 UTC