- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 16:23:23 +0200
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
good afternoon; > On 13. Apr 2026, at 14:45, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > now that RDF 1.2 Concepts and RDF 1.2 Semantics are published as Candidate Recommendation, our webmaster suggested to me that we may want to have the "version-less" URLs [1,2] point to the 1.2 version (Candidate Rec) rather than the 1.1 version (Rec). why would one want to create a situation where the document content version is inconsistent? > > I think that is a good idea, and suggest we put this on the agenda of our next meeting. > > pa > > --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Monday, 13 April 2026 14:23:39 UTC