RDF Data Access Weekly

REDUCED tests

swh, any chance you've had an opportunity to run or look at the REDUCED tests ?

<swh> LeeF: no, I dont have time to modify my harness to run the tests, so I've not looked

<swh> I could maybe eyeball them?

I would like that :)

<swh> do you have an URL?

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/reduced/

<swh> thanks

Orri: iv_an_ru has looked at the REDUCED tests and they are ok

-> AndyS's results on REDUCED tests

<swh> LeeF, I agree with the test - if the semantics of mf:ReducedCardinalityTest are that the cardinality should be [1,n] when n is what's in the results file

<swh> * tests

swh, those are exactly the intended semantics

<swh> LeeF, neat

<swh> LeeF, note, I've not actually run them, but they look good to me

That's ok, we've got two successful runs (AndyS and me) and two other eyeballs

PROPOSE: Approve the two syntax tests and two evalutation tests for REDUCED as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/0060.html modulo manifest change to use something other than rdf:type for indicating that it's a "REDUCED" test

<swh> seconded

any objections or abstentions?

resolved.

Edits during PR

AndyS: Can the editors make any changes at all to the documents during PR?

LeeF: The process document doesn't seem to say one way or the other
... I will investigate further

<scribe> ACTION: LeeF to determine if any edits can be made between PR and Rec, or if all further edits become errata [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/13-dawg-minutes.html#action01]

<scribe> ACTION: LeeF mark reduced tests approve and update manifest with new way of indicating that a test uses reduced semantics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/13-dawg-minutes.html#action02]

<scribe> ACTION: LeeF to solicit implementation results from reduced tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/13-dawg-minutes.html#action03]

testimonials

<swh> LeeF, I've got an outstanding action to extract a testimonial - when's the deadline on that

LeeF: I need to talk to W3C folks, but I'm guessing the deadline will be 2nd week of December

<AndyS> which is Dec 14

LeeF: But the informal deadline is ASAP :-)

<swh> ok, I'll start the process - is there somewhere to crib good examples from?

<swh> hrm, we may not want our testimonial to go out before our press embargo on the 28th, but that's still before the deadline

-> testimonial guidelines, with links to examples

ADJOURNED

scribe: discussion of benchmarking XG follows