See also: IRC log
Short meeting due to limited attendance, topics discussed:
AndyS: Many of the rq25 changes
made; need to talk with ericP about some section 11
changes
... reviews always encouraged, perhaps people can choose
specific section that interest them in reviewing to ease the
review burden
LeeF: I'll talk to Kendall,
Steve, and others to see where their ability to review
currently stands
... optimistically/speculatively might hope to have reviews of
near-final rq25 next week, decision to publish last call in 2
weeks
Orri offers to look over the protocol document
SimonR: I think that a small set
of carefully reviewed tests would encourage more people to look
through the tests and be more likely to test the specific parts
of SPARQL that need to be tested - bigger is not necessarily
better
... maybe we could even annotate the end of each section of the
QL document with the relevant tests for that section to aid
readers/implementors
LeeF: Concerned with schedule because we're looking to publish LC and CR specs before the test work is finished
AndyS: Concerned with additional administrative work that will delay schedule -- in this case, time needed to agree on "core" tests
<SimonR> LeeF, your retention is admirable!
LeeF: We can use the URIs in Eric's classification work to automatically post-annotate the QL document with relevant tests
SimonR: ...and Eric's work will help us determine equivalence classes of tests to aid in selecting core tests down the line
<General agreement that in an ideal world ending up with a core set of tests is probably a good idea, but time and energy prevent us from doing it at the moment.>
LeeF: Anyone with time / energy can annotate the test manifests with :featuredTest markers down the line and produce a minimal test suite from that
LeeF: Let's adjourn early, meet next week, and continue discussions on the mailing list
<SimonR> Adjourned at 14:55Z.
ADJOURNED
<scribe> ACTION: AndyS to add text clarifying the prohibition on blank node labels in multiple BGPs to rq25 [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-dawg-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: Elias to add wording for PROPOSED: ed(The SPARLQ Protocol does not derefrence query URIs so 5.1.3 does not apply. Per 5.1.4, services must define their own base URI, which may be the service invocation URI.) [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-dawg-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-dawg-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-dawg-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> ACTION: Lee to talk to protocol editors re: POSTing application/sparql-query [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-dawg-minutes.html#action05]
(some of those are done, but we'll take them up next week officially)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127 of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: LeeF Inferring ScribeNick: LeeF WARNING: Replacing list of attendees. Old list: AndyS LeeF Simon_Raboczi Orri_Erling New list: EricP Default Present: EricP Present: LeeF AndyS Orri SimonR Regrets: Souri EliasT Jeen Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/ Got date from IRC log name: 20 Feb 2007 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-dawg-minutes.html People with action items: andys elias ericp lee leef[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]