Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
RDF Data Access WG
teleconference 2005-09-27T14:30Z
teleconference bridge:
+1.617.761.6200
code:7333
supplementary IRC chat:
#dawg
log
to appear
scribe: volunteer please?
PROPOSED
: to accept
Minutes of RDF Data Access WG 2005-09-13
as a true record
PROPOSED
: to meet again 4 Oct per regular schedule
scribe volutneer, please?
Let's continue these without discussion:
ACTION: DanC
to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
ACTION: DaveB
to to propose source test to approve
ACTION: SteveH
to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization (ref
28 Jun discussion)
ACTION: AndyS
to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting test cases) ref
ftf5 BOS discussion
ACTION: ericp
to draft lang-match design, summarizing and citing RFC3066
Comments on the agenda?
Protocol Last Call
ACTION: EricP: publish proto-wd v 1.68 + changes from as LCWD.
DONE
Namespace documents OK now? publish a fix?
SPARQL Protocol and WSDL
ACTION: LeeF
to draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias
ACTION: DanC
to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2 SPARQL protocol stuff, once both are available
ACTION: KC
to work with WSDL WG on describing POST binding with application/x-form-encoded in WSDL 2
ACTION: KC
to work with WSDL WG on moving "style" from interface to binding
issues#sort
ACTION: EricP
to extend < and relational ops to string, get review by Andy.
done/progress
ACTION: DanC
to ask I18N WG for review of < on strings
ACTION: DaveB
to find query with FILTER on URIs
BASE IRI resolution comment
ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern. re
BASE IRI resolution comment
issues#valueTesting: handling type "error"s
ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from comment on truth tables in
commentor's message
ACTION EricP
: respond to
comment
on valueTesting issue
note
Type errors with xsd:boolean arguments
from DaveB 19Sep
issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction
Note
thoughts from Tuesday telecon
regarding 20 Sep teleconference. Any chance we can have a proposal ready to decide in our 4 Oct meeting?
SPARQL QL grammar
ACTION DaveB: review SyntaxDev grammar tests.
DONE
. Looks like a thumbs-up.
ACTION SteveH
: review the SyntaxDev grammar tests
issues#badIRIRef
We resolved this 13 Sep; where are we on spec text and getting back to the commentor?