- From: Martin Thomson via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 23:49:48 +0000
- To: public-patwg@w3.org
martinthomson has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/patwg: == Agenda Request - DAP Integration == ## Agenda+: What do you want to discuss? The current DAP integration seems sound in theory. However, adoption of the specification has stalled due to some mismatches with the architecture of DAP. Discussions with @cjpatton have pointed to what might be a better way to integrate with the way that DAP has been constructed and deployed. There are some minor benefits to that approach and some questions we'd need to resolve. I'd like to use this time to work out whether to make a change and, if so, answer the questions that will allow that change to be made expediently. ## Time 45 minutes ### Links * [slides](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LvX9eDMDU4rL9ygqJzKeWLDBGc-2-a95qMySgOLp90o/edit?usp=sharing) * [current DAP extension specification](https://martinthomson.github.io/dap-dp-ext/draft-thomson-ppm-dap-dp-ext.html) Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/patwg/issues/76 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2026 23:49:49 UTC