- From: Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 11:19:51 +0000
- To: Media Working Group <public-media-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <VI0PR01MB12002814A5844504EF4E43F6BA89EA@VI0PR01MB12002.eurprd01.prod.exchangela>
Responding as BBC, not as Media WG Chair: I support progressing the Media Playback Quality spec, and proposed additions, on the W3C Recommendation Track. Speaking as WG co-chair: We haven't seen other replies to this CfC, and we do need your input to determine the way forward. So let's extend the deadline for another week. Please reply by the end of Monday 9 February. In addition we need someone in the WG to take on the editorial work involved. Please let me and Marcos know if you'd like to volunteer. Thanks, Chris ________________________________ From: Chris Needham Sent: 19 December 2025 16:15 To: Media Working Group <public-media-wg@w3.org> Subject: Call for Consensus: Media Playback Quality Hi Media WG, Following discussion in the December 9 Media WG meeting, this is a call for consensus on whether to advance the Media Playback Quality specification to W3C Recommendation status or upstream it to the HTML specification. Please see the following issue for context: https://github.com/w3c/media-playback-quality/issues/28 and the minutes from the December 9 Media WG meeting: https://www.w3.org/2025/12/09-mediawg-minutes.html Please reply to this email and state one of the following: * I support upstreaming the current Media Playback Quality specification to HTML and coordinate discussions on new Media Playback Quality features in the Media WG. * I support progressing the Media Playback Quality spec, and proposed additions, on the W3C Recommendation Track. Because of the holiday period, the CfC will end on Friday 30th January 2026.. Thanks, Chris (for the Media WG co-chairs)
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2026 11:20:26 UTC