Re: Second International Symposium on Invisible XML

Hi Wendell,

Coffeepot already supports options to output Json 
(https://docs.nineml.org/current/coffeepot/bk02ch08.html#output-json) or 
CSV (https://docs.nineml.org/current/coffeepot/bk02ch08.html#output-csv) 
as well as XML.  (I haven't checked any of the other processors.)

Sheila

On 2026-08-19 12:46, Wendell Piez wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Thanks for reading, and to Elisa for an amazing job rethreading those 
> lost posts. That appears to have required some (human) effort.
>
> I'd like to add as a footnote to Steven's observation (iXML as gateway 
> technology) that (as he and we hardly need reminding) XML does not 
> have to be scarier than an angle bracket (or a few), and if you want 
> your iXML processor to hide those, that can easily be arranged.
>
> While I am not volunteering for more jobs,as part of the propaganda 
> effort, maybe "someone" needs to makea black-box demo -- say,a 
> two-step XProc that parses something meaningfulusing iXML and emits 
> JSON. There are worse ways to design and support a bespoke text-based 
> format for your needs, in home and business, and iXML is a fine way to 
> specify such a format, irrespective of what  kinds of results are 
> (sooner or later) produced.
>
> I recently met a guy who was seriously parsing his Markdown using 
> home-grown ANTLR-alike grammars written in Rust. (For context: an 
> Irish developer transplanted to New Jersey.) I recommended looking 
> into Declarative Amsterdam (because what I saw was aiming for an 
> entirely declarative layer, not just a tunnel to HTML). This person 
> was crazy for Markdown and HTML/CSS but pretty much at sea with 
> anything containing an "X". He (or they) needs to be able to find 
> their tribe.
>
> Cheers, Wendell
>
>
> Cheers, Wendell
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 6:04 AM Steven Pemberton 
> <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for this great information about ixml at TEI, Elisa.
>
>     I see ixml as a possible gateway to XML, and while the name 'XML'
>     is poisoned in some communities, 'markup' isn't. So what I'm
>     hoping is that people may be tempted by the title to look at the
>     program, and see things that are interesting, and decide to come,
>     whereas people who think they don't like XML may well not even
>     look at the program.
>
>     Steven
>
>     On Wednesday 19 August 2026 02:52:53 (+02:00), Beshero-Bondar,
>     Elisa Eileen wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>         Thanks for checking in about missing some of my messages to
>         the public-ixml list today! I discovered the problem is on my
>         end: Replies to posts from my phone are being sent from my
>         gmail address, and not my psu.edu <http://psu.edu> address.
>         I've been writing from my phone on a plane this afternoon
>         coming home from the TEI conference in Vancouver, and realized
>         the problem after I looked up my subscription. I subscribed to
>         this list from my university address.
>
>         If I was replying to someone, the list is nicely configured to
>         make sure they receive my message. Checking the archives
>         confirms I've been kind of a "ghost" today:
>         https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2026Aug/
>
>         Now that I'm back on my computer, I think this message will
>         post properly, so I'll just (for the record) paste in my few
>         messages from the flight today. (I should change my settings
>         so this one mirrors the other lists in my life.)
>
>         In reply to Wendell's post that starts, 'Dear Norm and list, 
>         / I am pretty confident that the new humans will reject the
>         so-called 'wisdom' of their elders who spurn XML. At least
>         some of them.'  I wrote about some of those humans from the
>         TEI2026 conference last week:
>
>             Hi all,
>             At the TEI conference last week, I found a lot of people
>             asking me what they should know about invisible XML, kind
>             of tentatively interested to see if they should take time
>             to learn it.
>
>             Context:  A new grad from my program, Hadleigh Bills,
>             presented her project to make a TEI digital edition of the
>             Voynich manuscript using invisible XML to convert a very
>             regularly formatted but very esoteric transliteration file
>             of Voynich into XML, and thence (via XSLT) to TEI, and
>             thence (via CETEIcean) to a web edition preserving TEI
>             semantics, with IIIF to port in facsimile page images from
>             the Beinecke. People were asking us lots of questions to
>             learn more— “is it some kind of markdown? Is it regular
>             expressions? Etc)
>
>             (Hadleigh Bills’ project code with a Readme describing the
>             pipeline is here: https://github.com/newtfire/voynichTEI,
>             and slides for the TEI conference here:
>             https://slides.com/hadleighjae/voynichtei .
>             You all might find her invisible XML strategy interesting.
>             She learned this eagerly after trying a lot of complicated
>             regex replacements in Python. The ixml was a lot cleaner
>             and easier to read than the Python string replacements
>             she’d been trying.
>              )
>
>              It is interesting to discuss ixml in the TEI community
>             context—these people understand a need to move difficult
>             texts into tractable formats, and XML is a shared language
>             among TEI people.
>
>             In this space, XML and TEI were frequently discussed as a
>             format that mediates explicitly among multiple
>             technologies in digital environments—between databases ,
>             graphs, and publishing tech.
>
>             Elisa
>
>
>         Then Sheila sent this post, which included: 'Bethan makes a
>         good point in relation to "discoverability" - in that if the
>         name is changed, it will be important to ensure that there is
>         still explicit mention of "IXML"', and I replied:
>
>             I agree with Sheila and Bethan on this. Generally I want
>             people to start noticing “XML” now and becoming curious
>             about interesting new things happening around it. As in,
>             look—there’s another event about XML—what’s going on?
>
>             I have some hope for well-designed XML as medium for
>             transparent and efficient document data and metadata
>             exchange as a direct counterpoint to unreadable,
>             inaccessible, bloated alternatives used to train and
>             augment language models. I look forward to meeting others
>             interested in similar work… Could the letters “XML” appear
>             to be forward-looking now?
>
>             Elisa
>
>         Wendell replied to Sheila (probably not seeing my post), the
>         message beginning "Hello again, / Sheila makes an excellent
>         point that by no means should iXML be downplayed at the iXML
>         Symposium (as I think of it), in either marketing materials or
>         anywhere else."
>
>         To this, I replied briefly,
>
>             This phrase sprang to mind, Wendell:
>
>             The Invisible XML Symposium: for Markup and Beyond?
>
>
>         Then Wendell replied to me the message starting, "Elisa, /
>         Just to be clear (in case I misspoke) I don't think "iXML" or
>         "Invisible XML" should be in the name of the Symposium."
>
>         To this, I replied:
>
>             I confess confusion more than hair-splitting. If you’re
>             not actively working on or interested in invisible XML,
>             what would draw you to register? Wouldn’t you need a lot
>             of training workshops for people who come in without any
>             background?
>
>             Who are you trying to draw by hiding the name? And do you
>             think they want to hear papers by people working on
>             invisible XML?
>
>             Elisa
>
>
>         And Wendell responded with the post that begins: "Dear Elisa,
>         / I am not suggesting hiding the name so much as naming the
>         conference something more general, and not hiding what it's
>         about."
>
>
>         After that, Bethan noticed all the replies to me and none
>         *from* me on the list... I landed in Toronto, got to a hotel,
>         and figured out what happened.
>
>         At this point, after all the excellent ideas you're all
>         sharing, I like the title "International Symposium on
>         Invisible Markup". I'm also very much in favor of name
>         recognition. And (as I really wanted to share from my first
>         post today) I think you may find people interested in
>         workshops at the event. The fun thing about invisible XML is
>         that you really can get started learning it quickly—it's very
>         workshoppable! So an outreach event at such a symposium might
>         be a good idea. People in my world are hearing about ixml but
>         don't totally understand what it's for yet.
>
>         Hope this literally sets our archive in order again!
>
>         Elisa
>
>         Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD (she/they)
>         TEI Technical Council Chair
>         Development site: https://newtfire.org
>         Program Chair of Digital Media, Arts, and Technology |
>         Professor of Digital Humanities |  Director of the Digital
>         Humanities Lab at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         *From:* Sheila Thomson <discuss@bluegumtree.com>
>         *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2026 8:06 PM
>         *To:* public-ixml@w3.org <public-ixml@w3.org>; Bethan
>         Tovey-Walsh <bytheway@linguacelta.com>
>         *Subject:* Re: Second International Symposium on Invisible XML
>         I received the first message from Elisa but not the second one.
>
>         Excellent summary Bethan, thanks.
>
>         Sheila
>
>
>         On 18 August 2026 23:04:04 BST, Bethan Tovey-Walsh
>         <bytheway@linguacelta.com> wrote:
>
>             Sorry - a meta question. I appear to be getting only
>             Wendell's side of this conversation and not Elisa's - is
>             that the same for everyone else, or is my email client
>             misbehaving in some newly evil way?
>
>             BTW
>
>             ****************************************************
>
>             Dr. Bethan Tovey-Walsh
>
>             linguacelta.com <http://linguacelta.com/>
>
>             Golygydd | Editor geirfan.cymru <http://geirfan.cymru/>
>
>             Croeso i chi ysgrifennu ataf yn y Gymraeg
>
>
>>             On 18 Aug 2026, at 22:50, Wendell Piez
>>             <wapiez@wendellpiez.com> wrote:
>>
>>             
>>             Dear Elisa,
>>
>>             I am not suggesting hiding the name so much as naming the
>>             conference something more general, and not hiding what
>>             it's about.
>>
>>             You raise interesting questions as to who would be
>>             interested in a more general "markup": or "structured
>>             data" or what-have-you conference or event, but I can't
>>             answer that, since we aren't talking about what to name
>>             it, but what not to name it. ("iXML".)
>>
>>             I also think that if we (the iXML contingent) don't think
>>             our papers are interesting or should be interesting to
>>             someone who hasn't heard of iXML, or who has not yet
>>             heard of it -- we are doing ourselves a disservice.
>>
>>             Come to a markup conference. Learn about parsing,
>>             structured data, text as interface, code as text, history
>>             and principles of markup, iXML. At the Invisible Markup
>>             and Parsing Symposium (IMPS) we talk about how to parse
>>             our information and what we can do with it. What's so
>>             difficult about that? (I'm not suggesting that seriously:
>>             it's a throwaway to illustrate the concept.)
>>
>>             Of course (whatever the name), I can still submit a paper
>>             not XML-focused, can I not? In which any XML is entirely
>>             incidental? Or is the symposium really that focused on
>>             projects and toolchains enabled by iXML? If the
>>             organizing/program committee wants to focus on
>>             iXML-enabled toolchains, projects, ideas, there's nothing
>>             wrong with that either. My response to Steven (and
>>             subsequent explanations) is predicated on the notion that
>>             the symposium seeks to be relevant to everyone interested
>>             in the the problem space, not just the technology.
>>
>>             Cheers, Wendell
>>
>>
>>             On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 5:07 PM Elisa Beshero-Bondar
>>             <ebbondar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>                 I confess confusion more than hair-splitting. If
>>                 you’re not actively working on or interested in
>>                 invisible XML, what would draw you to register?
>>                 Wouldn’t you need a lot of training workshops for
>>                 people who come in without any background?
>>
>>                 Who are you trying to draw by hiding the name? And do
>>                 you think they want to hear papers by people working
>>                 on invisible XML?
>>
>>                 Elisa
>>
>>
>>                 Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD (she/they)
>>                 Chair, TEI Technical Council
>>                 Program Chair of Digital Media, Arts, and Technology
>>                 | Professor of Digital Humanities |  Director of the
>>                 Digital Humanities Lab at Penn State Erie, The
>>                 Behrend College
>>
>>                 Typeset by hand on my iPhone
>>
>>>                 On Aug 18, 2026, at 4:52 PM, Wendell Piez
>>>                 <wapiez@wendellpiez.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>                 
>>>                 Elisa,
>>>
>>>                 Just to be clear (in case I misspoke) I don't think
>>>                 "iXML" or "Invisible XML" should be in the name of
>>>                 the Symposium.
>>>
>>>                 This is not at all the same calculus as naming any
>>>                 other event or organization, FWIW. But for *this*
>>>                 event, I am trying to second Steven's suggestion
>>>                 that the focus be implicit, and created by the
>>>                 participants, not stipulated (and bounded by) the
>>>                 event's name.
>>>
>>>                 Thanks for splitting hairs with me!
>>>                 Cheers, Wendell
>>>
>>>
>>>                 On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 4:13 PM Elisa Beshero-Bondar
>>>                 <ebbondar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>                     This phrase sprang to mind, Wendell:
>>>
>>>                     The Invisible XML Symposium: for Markup and Beyond?
>>>
>>>
>>>                     Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD (she/they)
>>>                     Chair, TEI Technical Council
>>>                     Program Chair of Digital Media, Arts, and
>>>                     Technology | Professor of Digital Humanities |
>>>                     Director of the Digital Humanities Lab at Penn
>>>                     State Erie, The Behrend College
>>>
>>>                     Typeset by hand on my iPhone
>>>
>>>>                     On Aug 18, 2026, at 3:50 PM, Wendell Piez
>>>>                     <wapiez@wendellpiez.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     
>>>>                     Hello again,
>>>>
>>>>                     Sheila makes an excellent point that by no
>>>>                     means should iXML be downplayed at the iXML
>>>>                     Symposium (as I think of it), in either
>>>>                     marketing materials or anywhere else.
>>>>
>>>>                     I am not shy about saying that iXML should be
>>>>                     at the center. It is more a question of
>>>>                     messaging who is welcome to come. If someone
>>>>                     creates an iXML-workalike creating
>>>>                     S-expressions or curlies, I don't want them to
>>>>                     think they are outside the bounds of What May
>>>>                     Be Discussed. Those are really the people that
>>>>                     need to be there, are they not?
>>>>
>>>>                     Indeed, if any mention of "The Markup Y" or
>>>>                     "Declarative Z" must always be appended with
>>>>                     (hushed voice) "it's an *XML* event" just so
>>>>                     people feel they are being honest - that would
>>>>                     be an excellent thing.
>>>>
>>>>                     Again, I think Balisage has set a good example,
>>>>                     as its statement of interest is quite broad
>>>>                     beyond XML, and so does its title. It is
>>>>                     diminished if you think it was only an XML event.
>>>>
>>>>                     Cheers, Wendell
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                     On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 2:52 PM Sheila Thomson
>>>>                     <discuss@bluegumtree.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                         I see the merits of both options ("markup"
>>>>                         or "XML") and have no
>>>>                         preference either way.
>>>>
>>>>                         Bethan makes a good point in relation to
>>>>                         "discoverability" - in that if
>>>>                         the name is changed, it will be important
>>>>                         to ensure that there is still
>>>>                         explicit mention of "IXML" and "invisible
>>>>                         XML" in promotional material
>>>>                         and other related comms, to increase the
>>>>                         odds of it reaching people
>>>>                         searching for those more commonly used terms.
>>>>
>>>>                         Sheila
>>>>
>>>>                         On 18/08/2026 15:01, Bethan Tovey-Walsh wrote:
>>>>                         > I don't object to the change in
>>>>                         principle, but currently there are a lot of
>>>>                         people doing IXML and not a lot of people
>>>>                         doing "invisible markup". My concern when
>>>>                         we talked about this for the first
>>>>                         Symposium was about whether the term
>>>>                         "invisible markup" really means anything to
>>>>                         people - whereas we *know* that people are
>>>>                         talking about and working with IXML.
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         > (It does also seem weird to me that
>>>>                         someone who would be interested in markup
>>>>                         is *not at all* interested in XML. But I
>>>>                         have met humans, and "weird" seems to be
>>>>                         the one thing that they all have in common.)
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         > BTW
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         ___________________________________________________
>>>>                         > Dr. Bethan Tovey-Walsh
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         > linguacelta.com <http://linguacelta.com/>
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         > Golygydd | Editor geirfan.cymru
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         > Croeso i chi ysgrifennu ataf yn y Gymraeg.
>>>>                         >
>>>>                         >> On 18 Aug 2026, at 14:42, Norm
>>>>                         Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com> wrote:
>>>>                         >>
>>>>                         >> Steven Pemberton
>>>>                         <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> writes:
>>>>                         >>> Oh, hey! This XML stuff is actually
>>>>                         pretty cool!
>>>>                         >> I love your optimism. Have you met
>>>>                         humans? :-)
>>>>                         >>
>>>>                         >> --
>>>>                         >> Norm Tovey-Walsh
>>>>                         >> Saxonica
>>>>                         >>
>>>>                         >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                     -- 
>>>>                     ...Wendell Piez... ...wendellpiez.com...
>>>>                     ...pellucidliterature.org... ...raventracks.org...
>>>>                     ... xproc.zone... ...github.com/wendellpiez.
>>>>                     <http://github.com/wendellpiez.>..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                 -- 
>>>                 ...Wendell Piez... ...wendellpiez.com...
>>>                 ...pellucidliterature.org... ...raventracks.org...
>>>                 ... xproc.zone... ...github.com/wendellpiez.
>>>                 <http://github.com/wendellpiez.>..
>>
>>
>>
>>             -- 
>>             ...Wendell Piez... ...wendellpiez.com...
>>             ...pellucidliterature.org... ...raventracks.org...
>>             ... xproc.zone... ...github.com/wendellpiez.
>>             <http://github.com/wendellpiez.>..
>
>
>
> -- 
> ...Wendell Piez... ...wendellpiez.com...
> ...pellucidliterature.org... ...raventracks.org...
> ... xproc.zone... ...github.com/wendellpiez. 
> <http://github.com/wendellpiez.>..

Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2026 11:54:36 UTC