Re: New requirement - Simplifying Meta Data Profile

Sorry, forgot to mail to the group:

I think this discussion went from Metadata to XHTML1 and XHTML2 discussion.

I didnt see any conclusions on Metadata.

Do others still feel the need to carry the metadata discussion further, of
it does not seem to add value?

Regards
Sajid

On 3/30/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:28 +0900, Laurens Holst wrote:
> > As on http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 I seems you would like me to
> > provide an example of an XHTML2 document that works in XHTML1: "Hunt 20
> > Mar 2007 <http://www.w3.org/mid/45FE99D1.4070906@lachy.id.au> takes
> > issue with a number of XHTML 2 features; a reply from Holst makes a
> > number of compatibility claims. It would be useful to see these
> > subtantiated by test cases."
> >
> > Attached is a version of the XHTML2 document that is backing the
> > frontpage of www.backbase.com (home.xml). This document is a perfectly
> > valid XHTML2 document, as far as I can tell.
>
> Thanks for working out those details.
>
> Is this still about Simplifying Meta Data Profile? I think
> I have lost track of some of the context.
>
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
>