- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 03:04:03 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > Could we have a question regarding whether we think we should have one > > at all or not? The questionaire seems to somewhat assume that a > > telecon is a good idea, but several people have commented on this list > > negatively about the idea. Right now, the only way to say that in the > > survey is to say that the notice was insufficient, which is not really > > the same thing. > > Not so. It says: > > "If you see any reason that this teleconference shouldn't happen at all, > please put it in a comment." > -- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tel29mar/ Sure... it would be nice if we could see a tally of simple "yes" vs "no" results for whether we want a telecon at all, though. Surely adding a simple yes/no question would not be difficult. Could we add one? > And it doesn't assume that a telecon is a good idea; it's > explicit about my reasons for calling one... > "It seems we have enough agenda topics and issues[1] to merit a > teleconference." > [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 Sure, but this assumes that calling a teleconference is a good thing, which, it would seem, is a matter of opinion. Some people might argue that no amount of agenda topics would merit a teleconference. Thanks, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 03:04:13 UTC