- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:29:56 -0400
- To: <public-html@w3.org>
> L. David Baron wrote: > Proposed requirement: > New versions of HTML must not break > significant numbers of Web pages. I think I agree with the sentiment, but is is worded correctly? IOW, how is it possible a new spec can break existing *pages*? Would this more correctly be worded "New versions of HTML must not cause supporting clients to break significant numbers of Web pages?" Or something like that? -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.us
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:30:00 UTC