- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:06:27 +0100
- To: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:30:55 +0100, Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't understand why the new version still refers to HTML, since it > is backwards incompatible. Is there any reason for this? > > IMHO, a xhtml root element is more appropriate. This is not the appropriate list for XHTML2. I think you want www-html-editor@w3.org. (Although given all the new WGs that might have shifted as well.) This group will work on a backwards compatible version of HTML (including its XML serialization, called XHTML). -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 22:06:34 UTC