- From: Chaals Nevile <chaals@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 12:28:57 +0000
- To: public-ethtrust@w3.org
Hi folks,
there are so far a small handful of us in this group, but I thought I would
send a welcome message.
Some of you know the specification, some have participated in its
development before. Everyone is welcome to the group.
Things are still a bit in setup phase, although there are a couple of
technical issues filed that I hope we can resolve sooner rather than later.
I assigned myself as chair so we have someone to blame. Please let me know
if you want to share that specific workload for all the fame and glory it
entails...
We now have a baseline spec in Github, so we can start to maintain it.
I would prefer to keep all technical discussion public, in github (or on
this mailing list if people want to write email).
Please note we do have an "internal" mailing list. There are tens of
thousands of people with access to that list (participants in this group,
plus anyone with W3C Member access), but it's not available to the general
public. The only use I can think of is for planning the timing of meetings
(and location, if they are face to face).
A key goal is to set up a workflow. I am going to make a proposal in
Github, which will be roughly how I have worked on this spec in the past:
People raise issues in Github, and can propose PRs to fix them.
We have a periodic meeting, with an agenda published far enough in
advance to give people a realistic ability to engage via Github instead of
turning up to the meeting.
Agenda items can be labeled as one of
- "Resolve without discussion" - meaning that it seems to be simple
with a single proposal likely to have consensus.
*Unless* there is an objection received at least an hour before the
meeting, or made at the meeting, it will be resolved according to the
proposal
(usually meaning "merge the PR") even if the meeting is canceled or
doesn't get quorum.
- "Question" - meaning it *will not* be resolved at the meeting, but
someone wants others to discuss.
If a meeting thinks it has a clear answer, it can be proposed as
"Resolve without discussion" for the next meeting.
Anything that doesn't have one of those labels will be up for
resolution, based on discussion, and will not be decided if the meeting
doesn't happen.
For example, if there are a couple of competing proposals to resolve
an issue, the meeting could choose one of them.
In general, resolutions should aim not to surprise to people who have
followed the discussion.
At some point there will be a proposal to publish the next version as a
release.
Some chores I will be focusing on over the next couple of weeks:
- find a meeting time / schedule that works (and work out who expects to
attend meetings and who promises not to do so)
- propose a charter for the group. There is a template W3C provides, but
I'll propose a few additions, and hope we adopt it through the normal group
workflow
So, thank you for joining the group - welcome, please bear with us as we
get set up, I hope that the above explanations sound OK. Note that
everything is up for discussion, so if they don't, please say so.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles "Chaals" Nevile
Using fastmail.fm because it's worth it
Received on Friday, 22 May 2026 12:29:04 UTC