See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 25 April 2012
<scribe> Scribe: Josh_Soref
<fjh> Approve minutes from 18 April
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2012Apr/att-0041/minutes-2012-04-18.html
<fjh> proposed RESOLUTION: Minutes from 18 April 2012 are approved.
<darobin> +1 to approve
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 18 April 2012 are approved.
<fjh> Date for next F2F week will be 9 July for a 3 day meeting? (e.g. 10-12 July?)
<fjh> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43696/dap-20120413/results
<fjh> week of 9-13, 23 responses, 16-20, 16
Claes: are the plans to have a joint meeting with webintents?
darobin: we should ask them
... Are you asking for a specific reason
<bryan> also Media Capture TF should be asked if they can join
Claes: I just have vacations for that month
<darobin> ACTION: Robin to ask Intents TF if they want to join our f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/04/25-dap-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-535 - Ask Intents TF if they want to join our f2f [on Robin Berjon - due 2012-05-02].
<darobin> ACTION: Robin to ask gUM TF if they want to join our f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/04/25-dap-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-536 - Ask gUM TF if they want to join our f2f [on Robin Berjon - due 2012-05-02].
<darobin> ACTION: Robin to get back to Diana about hosting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/04/25-dap-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-537 - Get back to Diana about hosting [on Robin Berjon - due 2012-05-02].
bryan: that week overlaps with OMA
darobin: we tried to look around, that was the best
... It was that or September
RESOLUTION: Next F2F will be 10-12 of July
<fjh> status of CR transition?
darobin: hopefully call for Friday
fjh: any other way APIs to talk about?
darobin: No
<fjh> ISSUE-81?
<trackbot> ISSUE-81 -- How to represent dates? ES has Date but with no TZ information; using strings is less than ideal; do we have to create a Web Dates specification? -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/81
<fjh> ISSUE-81 closed
<trackbot> ISSUE-81 How to represent dates? ES has Date but with no TZ information; using strings is less than ideal; do we have to create a Web Dates specification? closed
<fjh> ISSUE-105?
<trackbot> ISSUE-105 -- Should the capture hint in HTML Media Capture be specified through a MIME parameter? -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/105
<fjh> ISSUE-109?
<trackbot> ISSUE-109 -- We need solid use cases for Feat Perms if it's going to fly -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/109
<darobin> close ISSUE-109
<trackbot> ISSUE-109 We need solid use cases for Feat Perms if it's going to fly closed
<fjh> ISSUE-109: we decided at F2F not to progress Feature Permissions as notifications is only clear use case now
<trackbot> ISSUE-109 We need solid use cases for Feat Perms if it's going to fly notes added
<fjh> ISSUE-116?
<trackbot> ISSUE-116 -- HTML Media Capture doesn't make sense if accept=image and capture=microphone -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/116
<fjh> ISSUE-117?
<trackbot> ISSUE-117 -- Should HTML Media Capture have options for front/user camera as in getUserMedia -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/117
<fjh> ISSUE-121?
<trackbot> ISSUE-121 -- Scope of sensor API and sensor discovery -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/121
<fjh> ISSUE-121: We have removed discovery from the sensor API
<trackbot> ISSUE-121 Scope of sensor API and sensor discovery notes added
<darobin> FWIW I just did a clean up pass through actions and closed ACTION-315, ACTION-360, ACTION-416, ACTION-421, ACTION-424, ACTION-430, ACTION-444, ACTION-459, ACTION-462, ACTION-471, ACTION-481, ACTION-486, ACTION-494, ACTION-513
<darobin> :)
Claes: my mail was the status of my actions
fjh: I don't think I'll be on next call
darobin: ok, I'll do it
[ Adjourned ]
trackbot, end meeting