- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:46:26 +0200
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKExBM+nNXQ0-08HO2Fj3uu2UJNnMY1GEQArOWgWwCoPDxbjOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Folks I want to clarify the proposal If you have any objection, or feel strongly on this issue please let us know an hour before Monday's call when we will discuss it. If you do not respond we will count it as agreeing to whatever we decide on Monday's call. My last email discussed the issue of licensing [1] I want to slightly change my proposal. APA seems to include software as well as documents. This may be appropriate or safer for where solutions are suggested. It also seems to cover anything in the AG licence, so hopefully there is no objection. So I suggest: - We use the APA licence to publish the *research *(and publish research under APA) and - We use the AG license to publish *guidance *focused work (And publish *guidance * under AG) That should put us in line to publish documents under the parent group who are the most focused on that type of publication and work better if they choose to integrate it at some later time. 1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2026Jan/0014.html -- All the best Lisa Seeman-Horwitz LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2026 13:47:06 UTC