Hi Jussi,

I think support for Sequences would be useful (and easy to provide), even if we are not talking about file output.
Loading sequences from files is very common in MIDI programs, and I see no reason why that should not be done on the web. So it would be nice to have a standard Sequence definition with which to work. I'm not saying that Sequences necessarily have to be loaded from SMFs, but if the Sequence definition existed, it could obviously be given a loadFromSMF(url) member function.

Also, if we had a Sequence object, it would wrap the output device, and play(), stop(), rewind() etc. functions could be provided quite cheaply out of the box. That might make Web MIDI even more attractive. :-)

But maybe I'm too close to the problem. Is there anyone else out there who needs to send a Sequence to the output device?

best,
James


Hi James,

A side note: the current spec has the notion of MIDIEvent as a DOM event that occurs when MIDIMessage(s) are received.

The toolkit you're referring to deals both with MIDI files (SMF) and MIDI devices. Our API is designed to work with just devices, and MIDI devices are just I/O, there's no notion of high level concepts such as tracks (although there's channels, but that's already in the spec) or sequences, unlike SMF does. It would seem a bit weird to me to complicate the spec with such high-level concepts as we don't even support reading / writing SMF files, nor do I think we should as the intent of the device is explicitly to allow communication with MIDI devices.

Cheers,
Jussi

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:32 PM, James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de> wrote:
Hi Chris, all,

Chris Wilson said (apropos Bug 18764)
I'd like to explicitly ask for MORE feedback from developers
using MIDI today on this issue.
I'm following the Bug 18764 debate very closely, but don't have the in-depth knowledge of MIDI's finer points to contribute much to the subject.  All I want as a future user of this API is that it is going to be succinct, work as efficiently as possible and be clearly documented. Whether functions are overloaded or not is not really crucial. If I want to use the Web MIDI API, then I'm going to have to learn it one way or the other.

But I'd like to open another can of worms: :-)
The current version of the API [1] supports MIDIMessages and MIDIEvents. Would it be possible for it to provide Sequence and Track objects as well? I've written my own versions of these for my current project (in Javascript), but think there must be people out there who know much better how to write them than I do. They are prime targets for optimization. We should not all have to re-invent the wheel.
Interestingly, there are versions of these objects in Leslie Sanford's popular C# MIDI Toolkit [2]., so he also seems to have thought that they were worth providing.

Any thoughts?

Best,
James

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/midi/specification.html#callback-navigatormidiaccesssuccesscallback-parameters
[2] http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/6228/C-MIDI-Toolkit






-- 
www.james-ingram-act-two.de