- From: Daniel Montalvo Charameli <dmontalvo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 18:33:39 +0200
- To: matt@thekinglink.com
- Cc: ARIA Practices <public-aria-practices@w3.org>, Mike Pennisi <mike@bocoup.com>
Direct link to manual is better :-) https://w3c.github.io/AgendaBot/manual.html Best. On 6/9/2026 6:32 PM, Daniel Montalvo Charameli wrote: > See the manual for the available formats. > > https://github.com/w3c/agendabot/ > > I was just proposing the minimum change to our existing wiki. > > Best. > > > On 6/4/2026 10:27 PM, Matt King wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> what are the syntax requirements for the agendabot support? I see that >> you put numbers in the headings for each agenda item. Is that >> required? I see separator elements after all but one of the numbered >> headings. Are the separators part of the agendabot support? >> >> The separators are simple enough. However, it seems semantically a bit >> off for them to follow rather than precede the headings. >> >> Manually adding item numbers is a little extra work during drafting, >> but if it makes scribing easier, I'm certainly willing to do it. >> >> Matt >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:41 AM Daniel Montalvo Charameli >> <dmontalvo@w3.org <mailto:dmontalvo@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> >> Based on last meeting's issues when trying to use agendabot, I've >> tested >> it. With a few minor tweaks to how we use to write our agendas on the >> wiki, it could work. >> >> See >> https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/test-agendabot <https:// >> github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/test-agendabot> >> >> Then if you want you could try this on a test channel to see if >> you are >> happy with the results it throws. >> >> Best. >> -- Daniel Montalvo Charameli >> Principal Accessibility Specialist >> W3C WAI >> > -- Daniel Montalvo Charameli Principal Accessibility Specialist W3C WAI
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2026 16:33:42 UTC