- From: Daniel Montalvo Charameli <dmontalvo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 18:32:00 +0200
- To: matt@thekinglink.com
- Cc: ARIA Practices <public-aria-practices@w3.org>, Mike Pennisi <mike@bocoup.com>
See the manual for the available formats. https://github.com/w3c/agendabot/ I was just proposing the minimum change to our existing wiki. Best. On 6/4/2026 10:27 PM, Matt King wrote: > Daniel, > > what are the syntax requirements for the agendabot support? I see that > you put numbers in the headings for each agenda item. Is that required? > I see separator elements after all but one of the numbered headings. Are > the separators part of the agendabot support? > > The separators are simple enough. However, it seems semantically a bit > off for them to follow rather than precede the headings. > > Manually adding item numbers is a little extra work during drafting, but > if it makes scribing easier, I'm certainly willing to do it. > > Matt > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:41 AM Daniel Montalvo Charameli > <dmontalvo@w3.org <mailto:dmontalvo@w3.org>> wrote: > > Hi all. > > Based on last meeting's issues when trying to use agendabot, I've > tested > it. With a few minor tweaks to how we use to write our agendas on the > wiki, it could work. > > See > https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/test-agendabot <https:// > github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/test-agendabot> > > Then if you want you could try this on a test channel to see if you are > happy with the results it throws. > > Best. > -- > Daniel Montalvo Charameli > Principal Accessibility Specialist > W3C WAI > -- Daniel Montalvo Charameli Principal Accessibility Specialist W3C WAI
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2026 16:32:03 UTC