Re: Agendabot

See the manual for the available formats.

https://github.com/w3c/agendabot/

I was just proposing the minimum change to our existing wiki.

Best.


On 6/4/2026 10:27 PM, Matt King wrote:
> Daniel,
> 
> what are the syntax requirements for the agendabot support? I see that 
> you put numbers in the headings for each agenda item. Is that required? 
> I see separator elements after all but one of the numbered headings. Are 
> the separators part of the agendabot support?
> 
> The separators are simple enough. However, it seems semantically a bit 
> off for them to follow rather than precede the headings.
> 
> Manually adding item numbers is a little extra work during drafting, but 
> if it makes scribing easier, I'm certainly willing to do it.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:41 AM Daniel Montalvo Charameli 
> <dmontalvo@w3.org <mailto:dmontalvo@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi all.
> 
>     Based on last meeting's issues when trying to use agendabot, I've
>     tested
>     it. With a few minor tweaks to how we use to write our agendas on the
>     wiki, it could work.
> 
>     See
>     https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/test-agendabot <https://
>     github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/test-agendabot>
> 
>     Then if you want you could try this on a test channel to see if you are
>     happy with the results it throws.
> 
>     Best.
>     -- 
>     Daniel Montalvo Charameli
>     Principal Accessibility Specialist
>     W3C WAI
> 

-- 
Daniel Montalvo Charameli
Principal Accessibility Specialist
W3C WAI

Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2026 16:32:03 UTC