回复：On contributing to the AI KR CG

Dear Paola,
Thank you very much for the detailed guidance and for sharing the contribution process. I will read the CG contribution guidelines and keep them in mind. If I prepare a small concept note, I will make sure it is focused, manageable, and aligned with the AI KR CG scope.
Thank you also for letting me know about the email issue. I will make sure to cc you directly when I send future messages to the AI KR list.
Best,
Yuqiang 
------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人：Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
发送时间：2026年5月16日(周六) 15:39
收件人：yuqiang<yuqiang@humanjudgment.org>; Stephen Watt<stevewatt13@peoplesevidencelab.com>; W3C AIKR CG<public-aikr@w3.org>
主 题：On contributing to the AI KR CG
Thank you for your interest in contributing to the AI KR CG! There are many ways to help shape the agenda here.
As a starting point, please read the contribution guidelines on the wiki: https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/wiki/How_to_Contribute_to_the_CG <https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/wiki/How_to_Contribute_to_the_CG >
See also this earlier post on welcoming contributions: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aikr/2025Nov/0085.html <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aikr/2025Nov/0085.html >
Pitching a talk
If you want to pitch a talk that relates to the AI KR CG, that is welcome. Please prepare a pre-recorded version so that CG participants who cannot attend live can view the content and send feedback via the mailing list. As the presenter, you choose when to give the live talk, but please circulate proposed dates, invite CG participants, and make the joining link available to those who register/express interest. It is OK not to share the call link publicly, to avoid spammers joining meetings *only registered attendees can receive meeting invitations.
General principles
Contributions must have a degree of novelty, be justified by a use case, fall within the scope of the CG's work, and address a problem space within scope. All contributions are made under the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA): https://www.w3.org/community/about/process/cla/ <https://www.w3.org/community/about/process/cla/ >
Ultimately, contributions should be geared towards creating new open specifications and eventually web standards, whether in entirely new fields or to complement existing standards where they fall short or are not freely reusable. This is the discussion space.
Process

 * 
Create a draft outline of what you want to contribute and share it as a wiki page or a post to this list. Make sure it aligns with the overall AI KR CG scope. Keep in mind that participant attention span is limited, so it s okay to send out reminders or repeat the post every now and then Just be mindful of participants bandwidith

 * 
Keep the contribution cognitively relevant and manageable. Nobody can read long text to figure out whether it is of interest to them. Include a few bullet points at the top summarising what the contribution contains and why participants should read and engage with it.

 * 
Make sure you address these questions: How does it relate to the AI KR CG? What problem does it address? What does the contribution consist of -- a term, a concept, a new point of view, a new dimension, a use case, an example, an API? The CG is not considering entire new architectures as contributions at this stage, so keep contributions focused.

 * 
When you have a concept note ready to share, ask for feedback from the group. When it is reasonably formulated send to the Chair if you d like to submit to the CG Github repo
Organising calls
If you would like to hold a group call relating to a topic you want to contribute, you must announce it via the mailing list and make the joining link available to participants. After the call, circulate minutes indicating when and where the meeting was held, who participated, and what was discussed. Maintain a log of meetings to track the progress of your contribution, and make sure you acknowledge others who may be contributing to it.
Feel free to contact me should you need my help with anything 
Paola Di Maio, PhD
@yuqiang <mailto:yuqiang@humanjudgment.org > I may have missed a few emails from you as wel for example I did not receive a copy of your message below from the inboxed
until I received it as part of an offlist message trail, then searched the archive for it. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aikr/2026May/0015.html <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aikr/2026May/0015.html >
Please make sure you cc me in all correspondence you sent to the AI KR list, because for some reason, it disappear from my inbox
It may have something to do with spam filters getting mixed signals. Apologies for the inconvenience
 On Thursday, May 14, 2026 at 11:33:43 PM EDT, yuqiang <yuqiang@humanjudgment.org <mailto:yuqiang@humanjudgment.org >> wrote: 
Hi Paola and Milton,
Thank you, Paola. I can prepare a small initial contribution for the CG resources or the AI KR GitHub repo. I will try to prepare it by next Friday and send it to you by email, so you can review whether it fits your expectations and whether it is useful for the current work.
Milton, thank you as well. I agree that “drift” and “constraints” are also important examples where terminology, evidence, and governance claims can easily diverge.
I will keep the contribution lightweight and focus on a few concepts, such as claim, evidence, counterexample condition, drift, and constraint. For each concept, I will include a short definition and a simple use case.
Best regards,
Yuqiang