[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: PSO-PC archives



Hello Martin,

Thank you very much for notifying me this technical problem.
I have contacted our IT specialists in order to get this problem fixed.
As I am not dealing with it personally on the technical level, may be you could be so kind as to withdaw your proposal of including this point into the Agenda for the conference call?
This problem is going to be fixed as soon as possible
Thank you very much,

Best regards,
Vlad

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:15 PM
To: Androuchko, Vladimir; pso-pc@ties.itu.ch
Subject: RE: PSO-PC archives


Hello Vladimir,

I have looked again at the archives today, and the problem
is exactly the same. How am I or anybody else supposed to
use the archive if every message is listed 100 times or so?
How am I supposed to participate in the teleconferences in
a productive way if I can't check what has been going on
before I joined the PSO-PC?

Can you please add an agenda item for the teleconference
to discuss this issue?

Many thanks in advance for your help,     Martin.


At 09:18 01/12/12 +0100, Androuchko, Vladimir wrote:
>Dear Protocol Council Members,
>I asked our IT specialists to fix this problem.
>Best regards,
>Vlad
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@W3.ORG]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:55 AM
>To: pso-pc@ties.itu.ch
>Subject: Fwd: PSO-PC archives
>
>
>Hello Vlad, everybody,
>
> >From: "Androuchko, Vladimir" <vladimir.androuchko@itu.int>
> >To: "'Martin Duerst'" <duerst@w3.org>
> >Subject: PSO-PC archives
> >Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:29:16 +0100
>
> >Dear Martin,
> >
> >PSO-PC archives are available at the following address:
> >
> >http://ties.itu.int/pso-pc/
>
>I have just looked at it. But there is something very
>strange. Each of the mails seems to be archived dozens
>of times, for the first one I counted close to 200.
>They all have different numbers, but exactly the same
>text. Can this be fixed? Or is there a way around it?
>
>Regards,   Martin.