Howdy,
It seems this has already been sent, but the text I
was looking for was more along the lines of:
"Please find enclosed ... prepared by and forwarded
on behalf of ETSI. The PSO as a body did not find
any comments to make within the scope of its mandate."
As sent, it seems like 3 of the 4 PSO members simply
didn't do any work, and that was certainly not the
position the IETF has taken.
Truly, to reduce confusion:
. ETSI should have forwarded the comments itself
. We (the PSO) should have responded that we
had no comments
Leslie.
"Androuchko, Vladimir" wrote:
>
> Dear Protocol Council Members,
>
> Please find below the draft text for your consideration to accompany the Paper on the ICANN Budget, prepared by ETSI.
> Best regards,
> Vlad
>
> *************************************************
>
> Dear Stuart,
>
> Please find enclosed the comments/recommendations on the ICANN Budget for the financial year 2002-2003, prepared by ETSI Representatives.
> Other Protocol Supporting Organizations have not provided comments on this matter.
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Vladimir
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> Part 1.2 Encoding: base64
> Download Status: Not downloaded with message
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"An essential element of a successful journey
is recognizing when you have arrived."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------